Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Nov;98(11):1420-1428. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13670. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
The objective of the study was to investigate whether outpatient total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) could be performed as a routine without compromising patient satisfaction. The main outcomes were patient satisfaction with length of hospital stay, quality of life, complications and readmissions, and time to return to work.
A non-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I) performed in a single-center teaching hospital in Denmark. A total of 204 women scheduled for TLH on benign indication were randomized to same-day discharge or overnight stay after TLH. Visual analogue scales (VAS), a validated questionnaire EQ-5D, and a diary were filled in pre- and postoperatively. VAS scores on satisfaction with length of hospital stay and pain were administered taken with the EQ-5D and the diary during a follow up over 4 weeks. Student's t test, Chi-square and non-parametric statistics were used for analysis. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02933047.
A total of 204 women gave informed consent and 203 underwent surgery (101 outpatient and 102 inpatient women). Complete data were available for 76 women in the outpatient group and 86 women in the inpatient group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. No group differences were found in satisfaction with length of hospital stay (P = 0.35). The EQ-5D revealed no difference in patient satisfaction. However, one-third in the outpatient group chose overnight stay without medical indication. The groups were comparable in clinical outcomes. Sick leave was longer in the outpatient group regardless of the actual treatment (P = 0.015).
Routine outpatient TLH implies that one-third of the patients stay overnight if this option is available without medical indication. Within this context the procedure can be performed with high patient satisfaction, but may lengthen the time to return to work.
本研究旨在探讨在不影响患者满意度的情况下,是否可以常规开展门诊全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)。主要结局为患者对住院时间、生活质量、并发症和再入院、以及恢复工作时间的满意度。
这是一项在丹麦一家单中心教学医院进行的非盲前瞻性随机对照试验(加拿大任务组分类 I)。共有 204 名因良性疾病接受 TLH 的女性患者被随机分为 TLH 后当天出院或过夜留观。术前和术后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、经过验证的 EQ-5D 问卷和日记进行评估。在 4 周的随访期间,使用 EQ-5D 和日记评估满意度、住院时间和疼痛的 VAS 评分。采用 Student's t 检验、卡方检验和非参数统计进行分析。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 #NCT02933047。
共有 204 名女性患者知情同意并接受了手术(101 名门诊患者和 102 名住院患者)。203 名患者完成了手术,其中门诊组 76 名,住院组 86 名。门诊组有 76 名女性患者和住院组 86 名女性患者完整的数据。两组患者的基线特征无差异。两组患者在住院时间满意度方面无差异(P=0.35)。EQ-5D 显示两组患者的满意度无差异。然而,门诊组中有三分之一的患者在没有医学指征的情况下选择过夜留观。两组患者的临床结局相当。无论实际治疗情况如何,门诊组的病假时间都更长(P=0.015)。
在门诊常规开展 TLH 时,即使没有医学指征,也会有三分之一的患者选择过夜留观。在这种情况下,该手术可以获得很高的患者满意度,但可能会延长恢复工作的时间。