Suppr超能文献

四种用于检测深色材料上血迹的推定试验的比较

A Comparison of Four Presumptive Tests for the Detection of Blood on Dark Materials.

作者信息

Butler Julie, Chaseling Janet, Wright Kirsty

机构信息

Brisbane Scientific Section, Queensland Police Service, 200 Roma Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia.

School of Environment and Sciences, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2019 Nov;64(6):1838-1843. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14091. Epub 2019 May 31.

Abstract

Detection of blood on dark materials is difficult for crime scene examiners so presumptive tests are used to assist. This study compared the ability of luminol, leuko crystal violet, tetramethylbenzidine, and Combur Test®E to detect whole, diluted blood (1:100) and a key-shaped blood transfer stain (1:10), on dark cotton sheeting, tea towel, socks, synthetic carpet, and car mats. Powdered bleach was used to evaluate specificity of the blood detection tests. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall misclassification rate (OMR) assessed the quality of the blood tests. Luminol was the preferred test for diluted blood having the highest sensitivity (79%-96%), NPV (66%-93%), and the lowest OMR (3%-15%). Luminol was also found to be most efficient with a testing time on 25 items of 2 h 50 min compared with up to 8 h. Overall, luminol was the most effective method, also providing information on bloodstain patterns.

摘要

对于犯罪现场勘查人员来说,在深色材料上检测血迹很困难,因此需使用推定测试来提供帮助。本研究比较了鲁米诺、白细胞结晶紫、四甲基联苯胺和Combur Test®E检测深色棉床单、茶巾、袜子、合成地毯和汽车脚垫上的全血、稀释血(1:100)以及钥匙形状的血液转移污渍(1:10)的能力。使用粉末状漂白剂评估血液检测测试的特异性。通过灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和总体错误分类率(OMR)来评估血液检测的质量。鲁米诺是检测稀释血的首选测试方法,其灵敏度最高(79%-96%),NPV(66%-93%),OMR最低(3%-15%)。还发现鲁米诺效率最高,检测25个物品的时间为2小时50分钟,而其他方法最长可达8小时。总体而言,鲁米诺是最有效的方法,还能提供有关血迹模式的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验