Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Aug;73(8):786-792. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211094. Epub 2019 May 31.
Interpolation of missing weight values is sometimes used in studies of gestational weight gain, but the accuracy of these methods has not been established. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of estimated weight values obtained by interpolating from the nearest observed weight values and by linear and spline regression models when compared with measured weight values.
The study population included participants enrolled in the LIFECODES cohort at Brigham and Women's Hospital. We estimated weights at 28 (n=764) and 40 (n=382) weeks of gestation using participants' two nearest observed weights and subject-specific slopes and intercepts derived from repeated measures mixed effects models. In separate models, gestational age was parameterised as a linear and restricted cubic spline variable. Mean differences, absolute error measures and correlation coefficients comparing observed and estimated weights were calculated.
Mean differences and mean absolute error for weights derived from the 28-week linear model (0.18 lbs (SD 6.92), 2.73 lbs (SD 6.35)) and 40-week linear model (-0.40 lbs (SD 5.43) and 2.84 lbs (SD 4.65)) were low. Mean differences were somewhat greater at 28 weeks for weight values derived from the nearest two observed values (mean difference -1.97 lbs (SD 8.74)) and from spline models (mean difference -2.25 lbs (SD 7.13)). Results were similar at 40 weeks.
Overall, weight values estimated using this interpolation approach showed good agreement with observed values. When repeated measures of weight are available, mixed effects models may be used to interpolate of missing weight values with minimal error.
在研究妊娠体重增加时,有时会对缺失的体重值进行插值,但这些方法的准确性尚未确定。我们的目的是评估通过从最近观察到的体重值进行内插以及通过线性和样条回归模型获得的估计体重值与实测体重值相比的准确性。
研究人群包括在布莱根妇女医院的 LIFECODES 队列中招募的参与者。我们使用参与者最近两次观察到的体重值以及从重复测量混合效应模型中得出的个体特定斜率和截距,估计了 28 周(n=764)和 40 周(n=382)时的体重。在单独的模型中,妊娠年龄被参数化为线性和受限三次样条变量。计算了观察体重和估计体重之间的差异的均值、绝对误差度量和相关系数。
28 周线性模型(0.18 磅(SD 6.92),2.73 磅(SD 6.35))和 40 周线性模型(-0.40 磅(SD 5.43)和 2.84 磅(SD 4.65))的体重衍生值的差异较小。在 28 周时,来自最近两次观察值的体重值(差异-1.97 磅(SD 8.74))和来自样条模型的体重值(差异-2.25 磅(SD 7.13))的差异较大。在 40 周时结果相似。
总体而言,使用这种插值方法估计的体重值与观察值具有很好的一致性。当有体重的重复测量值时,可以使用混合效应模型以最小的误差内插缺失的体重值。