Suppr超能文献

肝内胆管癌患者淋巴结清扫术的治疗指数:哪些患者最受益于淋巴结评估?

Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2959-2968. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07483-9. Epub 2019 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the benefit and indication for lymphadenectomy remain unclear.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with ICC between 1990 and 2016 were identified in the international multi-institutional dataset. To determine the survival benefit from lymphadenectomy, the therapeutic index was calculated by multiplying the frequency of LNM in a particular group of patients by the 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate of patients with LNM in that subgroup.

RESULTS

Among 471 patients who met the inclusion criteria, approximately half had LNM (n = 205, 43.5%). The median number of resected and metastatic LNs were 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-8] and 0 (IQR 0-1), respectively. Three-year CSS in the entire cohort was 29.9%, reflecting a therapeutic index value of 13.0. The therapeutic index was lower among patients with major vascular invasion (5.4), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 5.0 (8.2), and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament (5.2). Of note, a therapeutic index difference of more than 10 points was noted only when examining the number of LNs harvested [1-2 (4.1) vs. 3-6 (16.1) vs. ≥ 7 (17.8)].

CONCLUSION

The survival benefit derived from lymphadenectomy was poor among patients with major vascular invasion, CEA > 5.0, and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament. Resection of three or more LNs was associated with the highest therapeutic value among patients with LNM.

摘要

背景

尽管淋巴结转移(LNM)是肝内胆管癌(ICC)患者的重要预后指标,但淋巴结清扫术的获益和适应证仍不清楚。

方法

在国际多机构数据集内,确定 1990 年至 2016 年间诊断为 ICC 的患者。为了确定淋巴结清扫术的生存获益,治疗指数通过将特定患者群体中 LNM 的频率乘以该亚组中 LNM 患者的 3 年癌症特异性生存率(CSS)来计算。

结果

在符合纳入标准的 471 名患者中,约有一半患者存在 LNM(n=205,43.5%)。切除和转移淋巴结的中位数分别为 4 [四分位距(IQR)2-8]和 0(IQR 0-1)。整个队列的 3 年 CSS 为 29.9%,反映出治疗指数值为 13.0。存在主要血管侵犯(5.4)、术前癌胚抗原(CEA)>5.0(8.2)和肝十二指肠韧带以外区域 LNM(5.2)的患者治疗指数较低。值得注意的是,只有在检查淋巴结清扫数量时,才会注意到 10 分以上的治疗指数差异[1-2(4.1)比 3-6(16.1)比≥7(17.8)]。

结论

在存在主要血管侵犯、CEA>5.0 和肝十二指肠韧带以外区域 LNM 的患者中,淋巴结清扫术的生存获益较差。在存在 LNM 的患者中,切除 3 个或更多淋巴结与最高的治疗价值相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验