Zdrali Evangelia, Etienne Gianluca, Smolentsev Nikolay, Amstad Esther, Roke Sylvie
Laboratory for Fundamental BioPhotonics, Institutes of Bioengineering and Materials, School of Engineering, and Lausanne Centre for Ultrafast Science, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Soft Materials Laboratory, Institute of Materials, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Chem Phys. 2019 May 28;150(20):204704. doi: 10.1063/1.5083844.
In this work, we provide a comparison between the stability and the interfacial structure of micrometer-sized and nanometer-sized droplets by employing a multi-instrumental approach comprised of the surface-sensitive technique of sum frequency scattering as well as dynamic light scattering and microscopy. We monitor the stability of oil-in-water and water-in-oil emulsions and the structure of surfactants at the oil/water nano-interface, when stabilized with an oil-soluble neutral surfactant (Span80), a water-soluble anionic surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS), or with a combination of the two. Micron-sized droplets are found to be stabilized only when a surfactant soluble in the continuous phase is present in the system, in agreement with what is traditionally observed empirically. Surprisingly, the nanodroplets behave differently. Both oil and water nanodroplets can be stabilized by the same (neutral Span80) surfactant but with different surface structures. A combination of SDS and Span80 also suffices, but for the case of water droplets, the strongly amphiphilic SDS molecules are not detected at the interface. For the case of oil droplets, both surfactants are at the interface but do not structurally affect one another. Thus, it appears that, in this study, empirical rules such as the Bancroft rule, the hydrophile-lipophile-balance scale, and the surfactant affinity difference predict the stability of the micrometer-sized droplets better than the nanometer-sized ones, probably due to a different balance of interactions on different length scales.
在这项工作中,我们采用了一种多仪器方法,该方法包括和频散射这种表面敏感技术以及动态光散射和显微镜技术,来比较微米级和纳米级液滴的稳定性及界面结构。我们监测了水包油型和油包水型乳液的稳定性以及当用一种油溶性中性表面活性剂(Span80)、一种水溶性阴离子表面活性剂(十二烷基硫酸钠,SDS)或两者组合进行稳定时,油/水纳米界面处表面活性剂的结构。发现只有当体系中存在可溶于连续相的表面活性剂时,微米级液滴才能被稳定,这与传统上凭经验观察到的情况一致。令人惊讶的是,纳米液滴的行为有所不同。油纳米液滴和水纳米液滴都可以用相同的(中性Span80)表面活性剂稳定,但具有不同的表面结构。SDS和Span80的组合也足够,但对于水滴的情况,在界面处未检测到强两亲性的SDS分子。对于油滴的情况,两种表面活性剂都在界面处,但在结构上彼此不影响。因此,在本研究中,诸如班克罗夫特规则、亲水亲油平衡标度和表面活性剂亲和力差异等经验规则对微米级液滴稳定性的预测似乎比对纳米级液滴的预测更好,这可能是由于在不同长度尺度上相互作用的平衡不同。