Department of Biological and Health Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:172-183. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.076. Epub 2019 May 30.
Although cognitive neuroscience has made remarkable progress in understanding the neural foundations of goal-directed behavior and decision making, neuroscience research on decision making competence, the capacity to resist biases in human judgment and decision making, remain to be established. Here, we investigated the cognitive and neural mechanisms of decision making competence in 283 healthy young adults. We administered the Adult Decision Making Competence battery to assess the respondent's capacity to resist standard biases in decision making, including: (1) resistance to framing, (2) recognizing social norms, (3) over/under confidence, (4) applying decision rules, (5) consistency in risk perception, and (6) resistance to sunk costs. Decision making competence was assessed in relation to core facets of intelligence, including measures of crystallized intelligence (Shipley Vocabulary), fluid intelligence (Figure Series), and logical reasoning (LSAT). Structural equation modeling was applied to examine the relationship(s) between each cognitive domain, followed by an investigation of their association with individual differences in cortical thickness, cortical surface area, and cortical gray matter volume as measured by high-resolution structural MRI. The results suggest that: (i) decision making competence is associated with cognitive operations for logical reasoning, and (ii) these convergent processes are associated with individual differences within cortical regions that are widely implicated in cognitive control (left dACC) and social decision making (right superior temporal sulcus; STS). Our findings motivate an integrative framework for understanding the neural mechanisms of decision making competence, suggesting that individual differences in the cortical surface area of left dACC and right STS are associated with the capacity to overcome decision biases and exhibit competence in decision making.
尽管认知神经科学在理解目标导向行为和决策的神经基础方面取得了显著进展,但关于决策能力的神经科学研究,即抵抗人类判断和决策偏差的能力,仍有待建立。在这里,我们调查了 283 名健康年轻成年人的决策能力的认知和神经机制。我们使用成人决策能力测试来评估被试者抵抗决策中标准偏差的能力,包括:(1)抵制框架效应,(2)识别社会规范,(3)过度自信/不自信,(4)应用决策规则,(5)风险感知的一致性,以及(6)抵制沉没成本。决策能力与智力的核心方面有关,包括衡量晶体智力的量表(词汇推理测验)、流体智力(图形系列测验)和逻辑推理(LSAT)。结构方程模型用于检验每个认知领域之间的关系,然后研究它们与皮质厚度、皮质表面积和皮质灰质体积的个体差异的关联,这些测量都是通过高分辨率结构磁共振成像进行的。结果表明:(i)决策能力与逻辑推理的认知操作有关,(ii)这些收敛过程与广泛涉及认知控制(左背外侧前额叶皮质)和社会决策(右颞上沟)的皮质区域内的个体差异有关。我们的发现为理解决策能力的神经机制提供了一个综合框架,表明左背外侧前额叶皮质和右颞上沟的皮质表面积的个体差异与克服决策偏差和表现出决策能力的能力有关。