• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机试验注册终点的同行评议评估(PRE-REPORT 研究):一项阶梯式、整群随机试验的方案。

Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA.

Medical Library, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 1;9(5):e028694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028694.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028694
PMID:31154313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6549750/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials are critical to the advancement of medical knowledge. However, the reliability of trial conclusions depends in part on consistency between pre-planned and reported study outcomes. Unfortunately, selective outcome reporting, in which outcomes reported in published manuscripts differ from pre-specified study outcomes, is common. Trial registries such as ClinicalTrials.gov have the potential to help identify and stop selective outcome reporting during peer review by allowing peer reviewers to compare outcomes between registry entries and submitted manuscripts. However, the persistently high rate of selective outcome reporting among published clinical trials indicates that the current peer review process at most journals does not effectively address the problem of selective outcome reporting.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PRE-REPORT is a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial that will test whether providing peer reviewers with a summary of registered, pre-specified primary trial outcomes decreases inconsistencies between prospectively registered and published primary outcomes. Peer reviewed manuscripts describing clinical trial results will be included. Eligible manuscripts submitted to each participating journal during the study period will comprise each cluster. After an initial control phase, journals will transition to the intervention phase in random order, after which peer reviewers will be emailed registry information consisting of the date of registration and any prospectively defined primary outcomes. Blinded outcome assessors will compare registered and published primary outcomes for all included trials. The primary PRE-REPORT outcome is the presence of a published primary outcome that is consistent with a prospectively defined primary outcome in the study's trial registry. The primary outcome will be analysed using a mixed effect logistical regression model to compare results between the intervention and control phases.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Cooper Health System Institutional Review Board determined that this study does not meet criteria for human subject research. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN41225307; Pre-results.

摘要

简介

临床试验对于医学知识的进步至关重要。然而,试验结论的可靠性部分取决于预先计划和报告的研究结果之间的一致性。不幸的是,选择性结果报告(即发表的手稿中报告的结果与预先指定的研究结果不同)很常见。临床试验注册如 ClinicalTrials.gov 有可能通过允许同行评审员在同行评审中比较注册条目和提交的手稿之间的结果来帮助识别和阻止选择性结果报告。然而,发表的临床试验中选择性结果报告的持续高发生率表明,大多数期刊目前的同行评审过程并没有有效地解决选择性结果报告的问题。

方法和分析

PRE-REPORT 是一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验,旨在测试为同行评审员提供注册的预先指定的主要试验结果摘要是否会减少前瞻性注册和发表的主要结果之间的不一致。将包括描述临床试验结果的同行评审手稿。在研究期间提交给每个参与期刊的合格手稿将构成每个集群。在初始对照阶段之后,期刊将随机顺序过渡到干预阶段,之后同行评审员将收到包含注册日期和任何预先定义的主要结果的注册表信息的电子邮件。盲法结局评估员将比较所有纳入试验的注册和发表的主要结局。主要的 PRE-REPORT 结局是存在与研究试验注册中预先定义的主要结局一致的已发表的主要结局。主要结局将使用混合效应逻辑回归模型进行分析,以比较干预和对照阶段的结果。

伦理和传播

库珀健康系统机构审查委员会确定这项研究不符合人体研究的标准。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上。

试验注册号

ISRCTN41225307;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae5/6549750/2eb32ca1badf/bmjopen-2018-028694f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae5/6549750/2eb32ca1badf/bmjopen-2018-028694f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae5/6549750/2eb32ca1badf/bmjopen-2018-028694f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.随机试验注册终点的同行评议评估(PRE-REPORT 研究):一项阶梯式、整群随机试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 1;9(5):e028694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028694.
2
Peer Reviewed Evaluation of Registered End-Points of Randomised Trials (the PRE-REPORT study): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial.随机试验注册终点的同行评议评估(PRE-REPORT 研究):一项阶梯式、群组随机试验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 28;12(9):e066624. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066624.
3
Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.同行评议员使用 CONSORT 清单短版本提高生物医学期刊发表的随机对照试验报告质量的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 19;10(3):e035114. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035114.
4
Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A systematic review.顶级身心医学和行为健康期刊中随机对照试验的结局报告和试验注册透明度:一项系统评价。
J Psychosom Res. 2011 Mar;70(3):205-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.09.015. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
5
Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.在麻醉学期刊发表的随机临床试验中注册结果与报告结果的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Oct;125(4):1292-1300. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002272.
6
Compliance with trial registration in five core journals of clinical geriatrics: a survey of original publications on randomised controlled trials from 2008 to 2012.五项老年临床医学核心期刊临床试验注册符合率:2008 年至 2012 年随机对照试验原始出版物调查。
Age Ageing. 2014 Nov;43(6):872-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu086. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
7
Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles: Primary Results of 2 Randomized Trials.提醒同行评审员注意报告指南条目,以提高已发表文章的完整性:两项随机试验的主要结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317651. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17651.
8
Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials.COVID-19 随机对照试验的透明度和报告特征。
BMC Med. 2022 Sep 26;20(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02567-y.
9
Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.随机对照试验中注册结果与发表结果的比较:一项系统评价
BMC Med. 2015 Nov 18;13:282. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0520-3.
10
Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.骨科手术干预随机对照试验中注册的主要结局与发表的主要结局的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Mar 2;98(5):403-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00400.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer Reviewed Evaluation of Registered End-Points of Randomised Trials (the PRE-REPORT study): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial.随机试验注册终点的同行评议评估(PRE-REPORT 研究):一项阶梯式、群组随机试验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 28;12(9):e066624. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066624.
2
Discrepancy review: a feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications.差异审查:一项关于新型同行评审干预措施以减少注册信息与出版物之间未披露差异的可行性研究。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jul 27;9(7):220142. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220142. eCollection 2022 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
The Stepped-Wedge Clinical Trial: Evaluation by Rolling Deployment.阶梯楔形临床试验:滚动式实施评估
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):607-608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21993.
2
Primary outcome switching among drug trials with and without principal investigator financial ties to industry: a cross-sectional study.主要研究者与制药行业存在或不存在经济利益关系的药物试验中的主要结局转换:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 8;8(2):e019831. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019831.
3
Selective outcome reporting and sponsorship in randomized controlled trials in IVF and ICSI.
体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射随机对照试验中的选择性结局报告和赞助。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):2117-2122. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex273.
4
Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review.血液学杂志中选择性报告偏倚的证据:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):e0178379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178379. eCollection 2017.
5
Toward a New Era of Trust and Transparency in Clinical Trials.迈向临床试验信任与透明的新时代。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1353-1354. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14668.
6
Clinical Trial Registration: The Time Has Come….
PM R. 2015 Dec;7(12):1203-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.11.003.
7
Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.随机对照试验中注册结果与发表结果的比较:一项系统评价
BMC Med. 2015 Nov 18;13:282. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0520-3.
8
Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial.阶梯楔形试验的样本量计算
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:354. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0840-9.
9
The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.评估随机对照试验的同行评审员的最重要任务,与期刊编辑最常要求的任务并不一致。
BMC Med. 2015 Jul 3;13:158. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0395-3.
10
Funding source and primary outcome changes in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov are associated with the reporting of a statistically significant primary outcome: a cross-sectional study.在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的临床试验中,资金来源和主要结局的变化与具有统计学显著性的主要结局报告相关:一项横断面研究。
F1000Res. 2015 Mar 26;4:80. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6312.2. eCollection 2015.