Suppr超能文献

系统评价:开始全身糖皮质激素治疗的非胰岛素依赖型 2 型糖尿病患者高血糖的管理。

Management of hyperglycaemia in persons with non-insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus who are started on systemic glucocorticoid therapy: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 1;9(5):e028914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028914.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

What is the most effective pharmacological intervention for glycaemic control in known type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) without prior insulin treatment and newly started on systemic glucocorticoid therapy?

DESIGN

We conducted a systematic literature review.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases and Google for articles from 2002 to July 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We combined search terms relating to DM (patients, >16 years of age), systemic glucocorticoids, glycaemic control, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

We screened and evaluated articles, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and quality of evidence according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines.

RESULTS

Eight of 2365 articles met full eligibility criteria. Basal-bolus insulin (BBI) strategy for patients under systemic glucocorticoid therapy was comparatively effective but provided insufficient glucose control, depending on time of day. BBI strategy with long-acting insulin and neutral protamin Hagedorn as basal insulin provided similar overall glycaemic control. Addition of various insulin strategies to standard BBI delivered mixed results. Intermediate-acting insulin (IMI) as additional insulin conferred no clear benefits, and glycaemic control with sliding scale insulin was inferior to BBI or IMI. No studies addressed whether anticipatory or compensatory insulin adjustments are better for glycaemic control.

CONCLUSION

The lack of suitably designed RCTs and observational studies, heterogeneity of interventions, target glucose levels and glucose monitoring, poor control of DM subgroups and low to moderate quality of evidence render identification of optimal pharmacological interventions for glycaemic control and insulin management difficult. Even findings on the widely recommended BBI regimen as intensive insulin therapy for patients with DM on glucocorticoids are inconclusive. High-quality evidence from studies with well-defined DM phenotypes, settings and treatment approaches is needed to determine optimal pharmacological intervention for glycaemic control.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015024739.

摘要

目的

对于未经胰岛素治疗且新开始全身糖皮质激素治疗的已知 2 型糖尿病(DM)患者,控制血糖的最有效药物干预措施是什么?

设计

我们进行了系统文献回顾。

资料来源

我们在 2002 年至 2018 年 7 月期间,检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库以及 Google 中的文章。

入选标准

我们结合了与 DM(患者,>16 岁)、全身糖皮质激素、血糖控制、随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究相关的检索词。

资料提取和综合

我们筛选和评估了文章,根据推荐评估、制定和评估指南(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines)提取数据并评估风险偏倚和证据质量。

结果

在 2365 篇文章中,有 8 篇符合全部入选标准。接受全身糖皮质激素治疗的患者采用基础-餐时胰岛素(BBI)策略比较有效,但根据一天中的时间不同,血糖控制效果不充分。以长效胰岛素和中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素作为基础胰岛素的 BBI 策略提供了相似的总体血糖控制效果。各种胰岛素策略的添加结果不一。作为额外胰岛素的中效胰岛素(IMI)没有明显的益处,而滑动比例胰岛素的血糖控制效果不如 BBI 或 IMI。没有研究探讨是否预期或补偿性胰岛素调整对血糖控制更好。

结论

由于缺乏设计合理的 RCT 和观察性研究、干预措施、目标血糖水平和血糖监测的异质性、DM 亚组控制不佳以及证据质量低到中等,难以确定控制血糖的最佳药物干预措施和胰岛素管理方法。即使是关于广泛推荐的 BBI 方案作为接受糖皮质激素治疗的 DM 患者强化胰岛素治疗的结果也不确定。需要具有明确 DM 表型、设定和治疗方法的高质量证据来确定控制血糖的最佳药物干预措施。

前瞻性注册号

CRD42015024739。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a48/6549610/9a3a1fc57c09/bmjopen-2019-028914f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验