Ruiz de Adana María S, Colomo Natalia, Maldonado-Araque Cristina, Fontalba María I, Linares Francisca, García-Torres Francisca, Fernández Rosario, Bautista Carmen, Olveira Gabriel, de la Cruz José L, Rojo-Martínez Gemma, Valdés Sergio
Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, Málaga, Spain; CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Spain.
Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, Málaga, Spain; CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Spain.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Nov;110(2):158-65. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin as basal insulin for the management of corticosteroid-induced hyperglycemia in hospitalized people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and respiratory disease.
Randomized, two-arm parallel group, clinical trial undertaken from February 2011 to November 2012 on the pneumology ward of the Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (Spain), involving 53 participants with T2DM treated with medium/high doses of intermediate-acting corticosteroids. Participants were randomly assigned to receive one single dose of insulin glargine or NPH insulin in three equally divided doses before each meal as basal insulin within a basal-bolus insulin protocol. The intervention lasted six days or until discharge if earlier.
No significant differences were seen between groups during the study in mean blood glucose (11.43±3.44 mmol/l in glargine vs. 11.88±2.94 mmol/l in NPH, p=0.624), and measures of glucose variability (standard deviation 3.27±1.16 mmol/l vs. 3.61±0.99 mmol/l, p=0.273; coefficient of variation 1.55±0.33 mmol/l vs. 1.72±0.39 mmol/l, p=0.200). Results from CGM were concordant with those obtained with capillary blood glucose reading. The length of hospital stay was also similar between groups (8.2±2.8 days vs. 9.8±3.4 days, p=0.166) There was a non significant trend for lower episodes of mild (4 vs. 8, p=0.351) and severe hypoglycemia (0 vs. 3, p=0.13) in the glargine group.
The results of this study showed that insulin glargine and NPH insulin are equally effective in a basal-bolus insulin protocol to treat glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia in people with T2DM on a pneumology ward.
比较甘精胰岛素与中性精蛋白锌胰岛素作为基础胰岛素,用于治疗住院2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并呼吸系统疾病患者的糖皮质激素诱导的高血糖症的临床疗效和安全性。
2011年2月至2012年11月在西班牙马拉加大学区域医院呼吸科病房进行的随机、双臂平行组临床试验,纳入53例接受中/高剂量中效糖皮质激素治疗的T2DM患者。参与者被随机分配接受单剂量甘精胰岛素或中性精蛋白锌胰岛素,在基础-餐时胰岛素方案中,作为基础胰岛素在每餐前三等分剂量给药。干预持续6天,或如有提前则至出院。
研究期间,两组间平均血糖(甘精胰岛素组为11.43±3.44 mmol/L,中性精蛋白锌胰岛素组为11.88±2.94 mmol/L,p = 0.624)及血糖变异性指标(标准差分别为3.27±1.16 mmol/L和3.61±0.99 mmol/L,p = 0.273;变异系数分别为1.55±0.33 mmol/L和1.72±0.39 mmol/L,p = 0.200)无显著差异。动态血糖监测结果与毛细血管血糖读数结果一致。两组住院时间也相似(分别为8.2±2.8天和9.8±3.4天,p = 0.166)。甘精胰岛素组轻度低血糖发作次数(4次对8次,p = 0.351)和严重低血糖发作次数(0次对3次,p = 0.13)有降低趋势,但无统计学意义。
本研究结果表明,在基础-餐时胰岛素方案中,甘精胰岛素和中性精蛋白锌胰岛素在治疗呼吸科病房T2DM患者糖皮质激素诱导的高血糖症方面同样有效。