• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受内镜鼻胆管引流术的可切除肝门周围胆管癌患者的术前病程。

Preoperative course of patients undergoing endoscopic nasobiliary drainage during the management of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8550, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019 Aug;26(8):341-347. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.640. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1002/jhbp.640
PMID:31155841
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there are many studies on technical outcomes of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD), no authors reported on preoperative course of patients undergoing ENBD. The aim of this study was to investigate the course of patients with ENBD during the waiting period.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) between January 2013 and September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 191 consecutive patients underwent surgical resection of PHCC after ENBD. Of the study patients, 154 (80.6%) patients were discharged, returned to their home, then re-admitted for surgery. The remaining 37 patients were continuously hospitalized. The number of cholangitis events during the waiting period was 0 in 120 patients, 1 in 59 patients, 2 ≤ in 12 patients. Endoscopic re-intervention was needed in 52 patients. The median length between the first admission and surgery was 37 days (range 12-197 days) in the entire cohort; it was longer in patients with portal vein embolization than in those without (43 vs. 27 days, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing resection of PHCC, ENBD is widely tolerable with relatively low incidence of cholangitis and thus recommended for preoperative biliary drainage.

摘要

背景

尽管有许多关于内镜鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)技术结果的研究,但没有作者报道过接受 ENBD 的患者的术前过程。本研究旨在探讨接受 ENBD 的患者在等待期间的情况。

方法

回顾性分析 2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 9 月期间接受肝门部胆管癌(PHCC)切除术的患者。

结果

在研究期间,191 例连续患者在接受 ENBD 后接受了 PHCC 的手术切除。在研究患者中,154 例(80.6%)患者出院,返回家中,然后再次入院接受手术。其余 37 例患者持续住院。120 例患者中有 0 例发生胆管炎,59 例有 1 例,12 例有 2 例或更多。52 例需要内镜再次干预。整个队列中,首次入院和手术之间的中位时间为 37 天(范围 12-197 天);接受门静脉栓塞术的患者比未接受门静脉栓塞术的患者长(43 天比 27 天,P<0.001)。

结论

在接受 PHCC 切除术的患者中,ENBD 广泛耐受,胆管炎发生率相对较低,因此推荐用于术前胆道引流。

相似文献

1
Preoperative course of patients undergoing endoscopic nasobiliary drainage during the management of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.接受内镜鼻胆管引流术的可切除肝门周围胆管癌患者的术前病程。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019 Aug;26(8):341-347. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.640. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
2
Verification of the oncologic inferiority of percutaneous biliary drainage to endoscopic drainage: A propensity score matching analysis of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.经皮胆道引流与内镜引流在肿瘤学方面劣势的验证:可切除肝门部胆管癌的倾向评分匹配分析
Surgery. 2017 Feb;161(2):394-404. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications.164 例疑诊肝门部胆管癌患者术前内镜鼻胆管引流:疗效的回顾性研究及与并发症相关的危险因素分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):121-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262b2e9.
4
Multicenter study of endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: E-POD hilar study.多中心研究经内镜术前胆道引流治疗恶性肝门部胆道梗阻:E-POD 肝门部研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;33(5):1146-1153. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14050. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Best options for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with Klatskin tumors.肝门部胆管癌患者术前胆道引流的最佳选择。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):422-429. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4993-8. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
6
Postoperative Mortality after Liver Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Development of a Risk Score and Importance of Biliary Drainage of the Future Liver Remnant.肝门部胆管癌肝切除术后的死亡率:风险评分的制定及未来肝残余量胆汁引流的重要性
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Aug;223(2):321-331.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.035. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
7
ENBD is Associated with Decreased Tumor Dissemination Compared to PTBD in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.ENBD 与 PTBD 相比,可减少肝门部胆管癌的肿瘤播散。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Sep;21(9):1506-1514. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3492-0. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
8
High-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the bile duct margin in patients with surgically resected node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with poor survival: a retrospective study.手术切除淋巴结阴性肝门周围胆管癌患者胆管边缘高级别发育不良/原位癌与生存不良相关:一项回顾性研究。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 Aug;24(8):456-465. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.481. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
9
Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage versus endoscopic biliary stenting for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction: Propensity score-matched multicenter comparative study.内镜下鼻胆管引流与内镜下胆道支架置入术用于恶性肝门部胆管梗阻患者术前胆道引流的比较:倾向评分匹配的多中心对照研究。
Dig Endosc. 2024 Jun;36(6):726-734. doi: 10.1111/den.14712. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
10
A Comparison of Preoperative Biliary Drainage Methods for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Endoscopic versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage.肝门部胆管癌术前胆道引流方法的比较:内镜引流与经皮肝穿刺胆道引流
Gut Liver. 2015 Nov 23;9(6):791-9. doi: 10.5009/gnl14243.

引用本文的文献

1
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon's perspective.肝门部胆管癌:外科医生的视角
ILIVER. 2022 Apr 5;1(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.iliver.2022.03.004. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Efficacy and safety of sequential cutting of nasobiliary tubes as an alternative to stent placement after nasobiliary drainage for the treatment of hilar malignant biliary stricture: a retrospective cohort study.鼻胆管引流术后序贯性鼻胆管切断术替代支架置入治疗肝门部恶性胆管狭窄的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性队列研究
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 17;18:17562848251319809. doi: 10.1177/17562848251319809. eCollection 2025.
3
ASO Author Reflections: The Impact of Time to Surgery for Survival Outcome in Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
ASO作者反思:手术时间对肝门部胆管癌患者生存结局的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1835-1836. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16758-9. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
4
Time to Surgery Does Not Affect the Survival Outcome in Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.手术时机不影响肝门部胆管癌患者的生存结局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1808-1816. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16628-4. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
5
Updates in Diagnosis and Endoscopic Management of Cholangiocarcinoma.胆管癌诊断与内镜治疗的进展
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 24;14(5):490. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050490.
6
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis combined with septic shock.超声引导经皮经肝胆道引流术治疗急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎合并感染性休克的疗效。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2023 Jul 29;78:100258. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100258. eCollection 2023.
7
Clinical Outcomes of Inside Stents and Conventional Plastic Stents as Bridge-to-Surgery Options for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction.内置支架与传统塑料支架作为恶性肝门部胆管梗阻手术桥接选择的临床结局
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr;68(4):1139-1147. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07718-y. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
8
Comparison of an Inside Stent and a Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metallic Stent as Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Patients with Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.可切除肝门周围胆管癌患者术前胆道引流中内置支架与全覆膜自膨式金属支架的比较。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jul 5;2022:3005210. doi: 10.1155/2022/3005210. eCollection 2022.
9
Improving Outcomes in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.改善肝门部胆管癌的治疗效果
Visc Med. 2021 Feb;37(1):48-51. doi: 10.1159/000514020. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
10
Fifty-year history of biliary surgery.胆道外科五十年史。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Sep 30;3(6):598-605. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12289. eCollection 2019 Nov.