Lauriola Marco, Tomai Manuela, Palma Rossella, La Spina Gaia, Foglia Anastasia, Panetta Cristina, Raniolo Marilena, Pontone Stefano
Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2019 May 15;10:1112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01112. eCollection 2019.
Although sedatives can defuse anxiety and relieve pain, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) still is uncomfortable and threatening for some patients. Identifying patients who tolerate digestive endoscopy less well remains difficult. Using a prospective design and a multimodal assessment of pain, the present study evaluated how anxiety-related variables predicted subsequent pain outcomes. Sixty-two consecutive patients referred for elective EGD were assessed for intolerance of uncertainty (IU), procedure-related worries, anxiety sensitivity and health distress before endoscopy. During endoscopy, a doctor rated patients' pain behavior. After complete recovery from sedation, the patients retrospectively rated endoscopy pain and situation specific catastrophizing thoughts. Descriptive analyses showed that patients undergoing EGD for the first time were more distressed and anxious than patients accustomed to the procedure and needed a higher sedative dose. Notwithstanding sedation, the behavioral rating of pain was above the cut-off value for probable pain for more than half of the patients. IU assessed before endoscopy predicted situational pain catastrophizing (PC) and self-reported pain after endoscopy through procedure related worries. Situational PC not only mediated the effect of worry, but also female gender and younger age were associated with self-reported pain through increased catastrophizing thoughts. Health distress and anxiety sensitivity predicted PC only for women, younger patients, and those not accustomed to the procedure. Our study showed that psychological preparation before sedation is needed especially for first-timers, women, and younger patients, addressing maladaptive cognitive beliefs and acquainting patients with the somatic sensations that they might experience during the procedure.
尽管镇静剂可以缓解焦虑和减轻疼痛,但食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)对一些患者来说仍然不舒服且具有威胁性。识别那些对消化内镜检查耐受性较差的患者仍然很困难。本研究采用前瞻性设计和对疼痛的多模式评估,评估了与焦虑相关的变量如何预测后续的疼痛结果。对62例连续接受择期EGD检查的患者在检查前评估其不确定性不耐受(IU)、与检查相关的担忧、焦虑敏感性和健康困扰。在内镜检查期间,一名医生对患者的疼痛行为进行评分。在从镇静状态完全恢复后,患者对内镜检查疼痛和特定情境下的灾难性想法进行回顾性评分。描述性分析表明,首次接受EGD检查的患者比习惯该检查的患者更痛苦、焦虑,并且需要更高剂量的镇静剂。尽管使用了镇静剂,但超过一半的患者疼痛行为评分高于可能疼痛的临界值。内镜检查前评估的IU通过与检查相关的担忧预测情境性疼痛灾难化(PC)和内镜检查后的自我报告疼痛。情境性PC不仅介导了担忧的影响,而且女性性别和较年轻的年龄通过增加的灾难化想法与自我报告疼痛相关。健康困扰和焦虑敏感性仅对女性、年轻患者以及不习惯该检查的患者的PC有预测作用。我们的研究表明,特别是对于首次接受检查者、女性和年轻患者,在镇静前需要进行心理准备,解决适应不良的认知信念,并让患者了解他们在检查过程中可能经历的躯体感觉。