Xu Le, Li Shengjie, Shabala Sergey, Jian Tao, Zhang Wenying
Hubei Collaborative Innovation Centre for Grain Industry/Engineering Research Centre of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2019 May 15;10:637. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00637. eCollection 2019.
is used as a model species in numerous physiological and genetic studies. Most of them employ parafilm-wrapped sterile culture. Here we demonstrate that this method is prone to potential artifacts and can lead to erroneous conclusions. We compared the effect of different sealing methods including air-permeable paper tape and traditional parafilm on seedling growth, root development and gene expression network. Although seedlings grown in Petri dishes after 1 week sealed with paper tape showed a similar growth phenotype to that of parafilm-sealed seedlings, more than 700 differentially expressed genes (DEG) were found, including stress and nutrition-responsive genes. In addition, more HO was accumulated in the tissues of parafilm-sealed plants. After 14 days of growth, paper tape-sealed plants grew much better than parafilm-sealed ones and accumulated higher chlorophyll content, with 490 DEGs found. After 3 weeks of growth, paper tape-sealed plants had higher chlorophyll and better growth compared to parafilm-sealed ones; and only 10 DEGs were found at this stage. Thus, the obvious phenotype observed at the latter stage was a result of differential gene expression at earlier time points, mostly of defense, abiotic stress, nutrition, and phytohormone-responsive genes. More O content was detected inside paper tape-sealed Petri dishes at early growth stage (7 days), and distinct difference in the CO content was observed between parafilm-sealed and paper tape-sealed Petri dishes. Furthermore, the carbon source also influenced seedlings growth with different sealing methods. In conclusion, conventional sealing using parafilm was not the optimal choice, most likely because of the limited gas exchange and a consequent stress caused to plants.
在众多生理学和遗传学研究中,它被用作模式物种。其中大多数采用 parafilm 包裹的无菌培养。在这里,我们证明这种方法容易产生潜在的假象,并可能导致错误的结论。我们比较了不同密封方法(包括透气纸带和传统 parafilm)对幼苗生长、根系发育和基因表达网络的影响。虽然用胶带密封 1 周后在培养皿中生长的幼苗表现出与用 parafilm 密封的幼苗相似的生长表型,但发现了 700 多个差异表达基因(DEG),包括应激和营养响应基因。此外,在 parafilm 密封植物的组织中积累了更多的 HO。生长 14 天后,胶带密封的植物比 parafilm 密封的植物生长得好得多,叶绿素含量更高,发现了 490 个 DEG。生长 3 周后,与 parafilm 密封的植物相比,胶带密封的植物叶绿素含量更高,生长更好;在这个阶段只发现了 10 个 DEG。因此,后期观察到的明显表型是早期时间点差异基因表达的结果,主要是防御、非生物胁迫、营养和植物激素响应基因。在早期生长阶段(7 天),在胶带密封的培养皿中检测到更多的 O 含量,并且在 parafilm 密封和胶带密封的培养皿之间观察到 CO 含量的明显差异。此外,碳源也影响了不同密封方法下幼苗的生长。总之,使用 parafilm 的传统密封不是最佳选择,很可能是因为气体交换有限以及由此给植物造成的胁迫。