Vomacka Madison M, Calhoun Melena R, Lininger Monica R, Ko Jupil
Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2019 May 1;12(1):614-622. doi: 10.70252/QLDK8340. eCollection 2019.
The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is used to classify individuals as ankle sprain copers, or as one suffering from chronic ankle instability (CAI). However, literature examining factors contributing to these classifications on the CAIT is lacking, as the CAIT itself does not offer explanations for specific anthropometric measures that influence a patient's classification. Therefore, the purpose was to determine if there was a difference between dorsiflexion active range of motion (AROM) between copers, those with CAI, and a healthy control group. Twenty-two individuals with recent ankle sprains were recruited by a convenience sampling method and placed in the coper (5 females, 5 males, age: 21.9 ± 1.5 years, height: 173.74 ± 7.69 cm, weight: 69.75 ± 10.50 kg) or CAI (10 females, 2 males, age: 21.8 ± 2.3 years, height: 173.99 ± 10.86 cm, weight: 68.14 ± 10.63 kg) groups. The remaining 10 individuals (4 females, 6 males, age: 23.2 ± 1.5 years, height: 178.05 ± 12.92 cm, weight: 75.65 ± 8.00 kg) who participated in the study served as control, as they had never sustained a previous ankle sprain. Dorsiflexion AROM measurements were evaluated using an inclinometer during a weight-bearing lunge. Three measurements were taken for each participant and used for statistical analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in average dorsiflexion AROM between the coper, control, and CAI groups (F = 2.063, 0.15, ω = 0.06, 1 - = 0.40). Further research is needed to determine if limited dorsiflexion AROM is indeed a contributing factor to an individual's classification as a coper or suffering from CAI, as defined by the CAIT.
坎伯兰踝关节不稳定工具(CAIT)用于将个体分类为踝关节扭伤应对者或患有慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)的人。然而,缺乏研究CAIT上这些分类的影响因素的文献,因为CAIT本身并未对影响患者分类的特定人体测量指标作出解释。因此,目的是确定应对者、患有CAI的人和健康对照组之间的背屈主动活动范围(AROM)是否存在差异。通过便利抽样方法招募了22名近期踝关节扭伤的个体,并将其分为应对者组(5名女性,5名男性,年龄:21.9±1.5岁,身高:173.74±7.69厘米,体重:69.75±10.50千克)或CAI组(10名女性,2名男性,年龄:21.8±2.3岁,身高:173.99±10.86厘米,体重:68.14±10.63千克)。其余10名参与研究的个体(4名女性,6名男性,年龄:23.2±1.5岁,身高:178.05±12.92厘米,体重:75.65±8.00千克)作为对照组,因为他们以前从未发生过踝关节扭伤。在负重弓步期间使用倾角仪评估背屈AROM测量值。为每位参与者进行三次测量并用于统计分析。应对者组、对照组和CAI组之间的平均背屈AROM没有统计学上的显著差异(F = 2.063,P = 0.15,ω = 0.06,1-β = 0.40)。需要进一步研究以确定有限的背屈AROM是否确实是个体被分类为应对者或患有CAI(如CAIT所定义)的一个影响因素。