PERIPHERAL ISCHEMIC RETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION IN ADDITION TO INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB ALONE FOR THE TREATMENT OF MACULAR EDEMA SECONDARY TO CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION: A Randomized Double-Masked Controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of peripheral ischemic retinal photocoagulation in addition to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in the treatment of macular edema due to ischemic central retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Forty-eight eyes of 48 treatment-naive patients were randomly selected and divided into 2 groups. Group A comprised 24 eyes that were treated with three consecutive monthly injections of IVB, and Group B comprised 24 eyes that were treated with IVB plus photocoagulation of the peripheral nonperfused retina. Further IVB injections were administered as needed in both groups. Monthly follow-up was conducted for 9 months after the first injection.

RESULTS

The data of 46 patients were analyzed. Best-corrected visual acuity changes from the fourth to eighth month follow-up in comparison with the baseline were significantly higher in Group B (P = 0.002-0.044-0.002-0.002-0.012). In addition, significant differences were observed in central macular thickness in Group B throughout the study period (all P < 0.001). Group B required less frequent IVB injections during the 9-month study period.

CONCLUSION

Photocoagulation of the retinal nonperfused area in patients with macular edema because of central retinal vein occlusion might amplify the beneficial effects of IVB on best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness and reduce the frequency of IVB injection.