• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真实世界中非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂的比较。FANTASIIA研究。

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in real-world patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The FANTASIIA study.

作者信息

Anguita Sánchez Manuel, Bertomeu Martínez Vicente, Ruiz Ortiz Martín, Cequier Fillat Ángel, Roldán Rabadán Inmaculada, Muñiz García Javier, Badimón Maestro Lina, Esteve Pastor María Asunción, Marín Ortuño Francisco

机构信息

Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.

Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de San Juan, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020 Jan;73(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2019.02.021
PMID:31160265
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the long-term results of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in real-world-patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in a nationwide, prospective study.

METHODS

The FANTASIIA registry prospectively included outpatients with AF anticoagulated with DOAC or VKA (per protocol, proportion of VKA and DOAC 4:1), consecutively recruited from June 2013 to October 2014 in Spain. The incidence of major events was analyzed and compared according to the anticoagulant treatment received.

RESULTS

A total of 2178 patients were included in the study (mean age 73.8±9.4 years), and 43.8% were women. Of these, 533 (24.5%) received DOAC and 1645 (75.5%) VKA. After a median follow up of 32.4 months, patients receiving DOAC vs those receiving VKA had lower rates of stroke-0.40 (95%CI, 0.17-0.97) vs 1.07 (95%CI,0.79-1.46) patients/y, P=.032-, severe bleedings-2.13 (95%CI, 1.45-3.13) vs 3.28 (95%CI, 2.75-3.93) patients/y; P = .044-, cardiovascular death-1.20 (95%CI, 0.72-1.99) vs 2.45 (95%CI, 2.00-3.00) patients/y; P = .009-, and all-cause death-3.77 (95%CI, 2.83-5.01) vs 5.54 (95%CI, 4.83-6.34) patients/y; P = .016-. In a modified Cox regression model by the Andersen-Gill method for multiple events, hazard ratios for patients receiving DOAC were: 0.42 (0.16-1.07) for stroke; 0.47 (0.20-1.16) for total embolisms; 0.76 (0.50-1.15) for severe bleedings; 0.67 (0.39-1.18) for cardiovascular death; 0.86 (0.62-1.19) for all-cause death, and 0.82 (0.64-1.05) for the combined event consisting of stroke, embolism, severe bleeding, and all-cause death.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with VKA, DOAC is associated with a trend to a lower incidence of all major events, including death, in patients with NVAF in Spain.

摘要

引言与目的

在一项全国性前瞻性研究中,比较直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)与维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)用于非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)真实世界患者的长期疗效。

方法

FANTASIIA注册研究前瞻性纳入接受DOAC或VKA抗凝治疗的房颤门诊患者(按照方案,VKA与DOAC的比例为4:1),于2013年6月至2014年10月在西班牙连续招募。根据接受的抗凝治疗分析并比较主要事件的发生率。

结果

该研究共纳入2178例患者(平均年龄73.8±9.4岁),43.8%为女性。其中,533例(24.5%)接受DOAC,1645例(75.5%)接受VKA。中位随访32.4个月后,接受DOAC的患者与接受VKA的患者相比,卒中发生率较低(分别为0.40例/年(95%CI,0.17 - 0.97) vs 1.07例/年(95%CI,0.79 - 1.46),P = 0.032)、严重出血发生率较低(分别为2.13例/年(95%CI,1.45 - 3.13) vs 3.28例/年(95%CI,2.75 - 3.93);P = 0.044)、心血管死亡发生率较低(分别为1.20例/年(95%CI,0.72 - 1.99) vs 2.45例/年(95%CI,2.00 - 3.00);P = 0.009)以及全因死亡发生率较低(分别为3.77例/年(95%CI,2.83 - 5.01) vs 5.54例/年(95%CI,4.83 - 6.34);P = 0.016)。在采用Andersen - Gill方法处理多事件的改良Cox回归模型中,接受DOAC患者的风险比为:卒中0.42(0.16 - 1.07);总栓塞0.47(0.20 - 1.16);严重出血0.76(0.50 - 1.15);心血管死亡0.67(0.39 - 1.18);全因死亡0.86(0.62 - 1.19);由卒中、栓塞、严重出血和全因死亡组成的联合事件为0.82(0.64 - 1.05)。

结论

在西班牙NVAF患者中,与VKA相比,DOAC与包括死亡在内的所有主要事件发生率降低的趋势相关。

相似文献

1
Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in real-world patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The FANTASIIA study.真实世界中非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂的比较。FANTASIIA研究。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020 Jan;73(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 May 31.
2
Direct Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients Aged 80 Years or Older With Atrial Fibrillation in a "Real-world" Nationwide Registry: Insights From the FANTASIIA Study.80 岁及以上伴有房颤的患者在“真实世界”全国注册研究中直接抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂的比较:来自 FANTASIIA 研究的见解。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jul;25(4):316-323. doi: 10.1177/1074248420916316. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
3
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation on vitamin k antagonists or direct-acting oral anticoagulants: patients profile and long-term follow up outcomes.接受维生素K拮抗剂或直接口服抗凝剂治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者:患者概况及长期随访结果
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2019;89(4):382-392. doi: 10.24875/ACM.19000023.
4
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban and Vitamin K Antagonist Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated in Routine German Practice.阿哌沙班与维生素K拮抗剂疗法在德国常规医疗中治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的疗效和安全性比较
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Mar;27(3):390-393. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 3.
5
Clinical profile of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K anticoagulants in octogenarians with atrial fibrillation: a multicentre propensity score matched real-world cohort study.八旬老年房颤患者中直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂的临床特征:一项多中心倾向评分匹配真实世界队列研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jan;49(1):42-53. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01923-9.
6
[Oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation: What is the guideline for using new drugs?].[心房颤动的口服抗凝治疗:使用新药的指南是什么?]
Semergen. 2018 Jul-Aug;44(5):297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
7
Anticoagulation Control in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Attended at Primary Care Centers in Spain: The PAULA Study.西班牙初级保健中心非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的抗凝控制:PAULA研究
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015 Sep;68(9):769-76. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
8
TIMI-AF score and cardiovascular events in vitamin K antagonists-naïve outpatients with atrial fibrillation.在初治维生素K拮抗剂的门诊房颤患者中,TIMI-AF评分与心血管事件
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Sep;41(9):1252-1258. doi: 10.1002/clc.23035. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
9
Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Valve Disease in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Initiating Direct Oral Anticoagulants.启动直接口服抗凝剂的心房颤动患者瓣膜病的患病率及其预后意义
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Nov;72(11):935-943. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.08.026. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
10
Direct oral anticoagulant- vs vitamin K antagonist-related nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂相关的非创伤性脑出血
Neurology. 2017 Sep 12;89(11):1142-1151. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004362. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative clinical outcomes of acenocoumarol versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: real-world-evidence (SIESTA-A study).醋硝香豆素与直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)及华法林用于心房颤动患者的临床疗效比较:真实世界证据(SIESTA-A研究)
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 1;16:1548298. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1548298. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran for thromboembolic events prevention in atrial fibrillation patients in Chile.达比加群酯预防智利心房颤动患者血栓栓塞事件的成本效益分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2025 Jul 7;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12962-025-00642-8.
3
Framing anticoagulation control according to clinical practice for patients with atrial fibrillation in Spain: a multidisciplinary vision trough AMFA Project.
根据西班牙心房颤动患者的临床实践制定抗凝控制方案:通过AMFA项目的多学科视角
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 5;12:1426072. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1426072. eCollection 2025.
4
Efficacy and Safety of New Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in the Resolution of Atrial Fibrillation with Left Atrial/Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新型口服抗凝药与华法林在心房颤动合并左心房/左心耳血栓溶解中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 20;26(1):26055. doi: 10.31083/RCM26055. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation Associated With Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Narrative Review.心脏淀粉样变性伴发心房颤动的抗凝治疗:一篇叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Jun 3;16(6):e61557. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61557. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Patients on vitamin K treatment: is switching to direct-acting oral anticoagulation cost-effective? A target trial on a prospective cohort.正在接受维生素 K 治疗的患者:改用直接口服抗凝剂是否具有成本效益?一项针对前瞻性队列的目标试验。
Open Heart. 2024 Jan 31;11(1):e002567. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002567.
7
Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study in primary healthcare in Catalonia.口服抗凝剂用于非瓣膜性心房颤动的有效性和安全性:加泰罗尼亚初级医疗保健中的一项基于人群的队列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 15;14:1237454. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1237454. eCollection 2023.
8
Impact of heart failure on the clinical profile and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban. Data from the EMIR study.心力衰竭对接受利伐沙班治疗的心房颤动患者的临床特征和结局的影响。来自 EMIR 研究的数据。
Cardiol J. 2022;29(6):936-947. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0091. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
9
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Octogenarians with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林用于老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 12;10(22):5268. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225268.
10
Infarct Volumes of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants due to Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.因非瓣膜性心房颤动接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的急性缺血性中风患者的梗死体积
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2021 Jan-Feb;24(1):27-31. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_568_20. Epub 2021 Feb 9.