Junker Kerstin, Zeuschner Philip
Saarland University, Dept of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Homburg.
Aktuelle Urol. 2019 Sep;50(5):513-523. doi: 10.1055/a-0895-9201. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
The extensive use of abdominal imaging reveals an increasing number of small and asymptomatic kidney tumours, for which primary treatment versus observation strategies need to be discussed. Elaborate surgical techniques and a variety of systemic treatment options are available for patients with localised and advanced tumours. This necessitates a demanding and complex individualised decision-making process. A better understanding of tumour biology including validated biomarkers is therefore essential in order to improve diagnostics, prognostic evaluation and therapeutic strategies.Renal cell tumours are currently subdivided into 16 histological subtypes, each characterised by specific genetic changes. As tumour aggressiveness differs significantly, knowledge of these distinct subtypes is important for adequate treatment choice and follow-up. Molecular markers may facilitate an exact diagnosis and will further differentiate the individual prognosis within each subtype, which is already possible for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This will lead to individualised follow-up protocols and a better selection of patients benefitting from observational or adjuvant strategies after surgery.For metastatic tumours, the number of systemic treatment options targeting specific cellular signal or communication pathways has increased tremendously. Valid predictive biomarkers for differential treatment are not available to date. However, there is promising evidence of correlations between molecular signatures and treatment response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors or checkpoint inhibitors. Biomarkers will most likely supersede clinical scores for individual treatment selection in the near future.Prospective multicentre studies are needed so that promising biomarkers can be implemented in daily clinical practice in due consideration of existing insights from the tumour biology of the distinct RCC subtypes. This is essential for further improvement of diagnosis and treatment.
腹部影像学检查的广泛应用发现了越来越多的小的无症状肾肿瘤,对此需要讨论主要治疗方法与观察策略。对于局限性和晚期肿瘤患者,有精细的手术技术和多种全身治疗选择。这就需要一个要求高且复杂的个体化决策过程。因此,更好地了解肿瘤生物学,包括经过验证的生物标志物,对于改善诊断、预后评估和治疗策略至关重要。肾细胞肿瘤目前分为16种组织学亚型,每种亚型都有特定的基因变化。由于肿瘤侵袭性差异很大,了解这些不同的亚型对于选择合适的治疗方法和进行随访很重要。分子标志物可能有助于准确诊断,并将进一步区分各亚型内的个体预后,这在透明细胞肾细胞癌(RCC)中已经可以做到。这将导致个体化的随访方案,并更好地选择术后从观察或辅助策略中获益的患者。对于转移性肿瘤,针对特定细胞信号或通讯途径的全身治疗选择数量大幅增加。目前尚无用于鉴别治疗的有效预测生物标志物。然而,有很有前景的证据表明分子特征与对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂或检查点抑制剂的治疗反应之间存在相关性。在不久的将来,生物标志物很可能会取代临床评分用于个体治疗选择。需要进行前瞻性多中心研究,以便在充分考虑不同RCC亚型肿瘤生物学现有见解的情况下,将有前景的生物标志物应用于日常临床实践。这对于进一步改善诊断和治疗至关重要。