• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗缺血性心脏病的成本效果比较。

Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared With Medical Therapy for Ischemic Heart Disease in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.

出版信息

Circ J. 2019 Jun 25;83(7):1498-1505. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0148. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0148
PMID:31168046
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ischemic heart disease is undetermined in Japan. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of PCI compared with medical therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and angina pectoris (AP) in Japan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used Markov models for STEMI and AP to assess the costs and benefits associated with PCI or medical therapy from a health system perspective. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and ICER <¥5 m per QALY gained was judged to be cost-effective. The impact of PCI on cardiovascular events was based on previous publications. In STEMI patients, the ICER of PCI over medical treatment was ¥0.97 m per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness probability of PCI was 99.9%. In AP patients, the ICER of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI over medical treatment was ¥4.63 m per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness probability of PCI was 50.4%. The ICER of FFR-guided PCI for asymptomatic patients was ¥23 m per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

In STEMI patients, PCI was cost-effective compared with medical therapy. In AP patients, FFR-guided PCI for symptomatic patients could be cost-effective compared with medical therapy. FFR-guided PCI for asymptomatic patients with myocardial ischemia was not cost-effective.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在日本用于缺血性心脏病的成本效益尚不确定。本研究旨在分析与药物治疗相比,PCI 在日本治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和心绞痛(AP)的成本效益。

方法和结果

我们使用 Markov 模型来评估 STEMI 和 AP 患者从健康系统角度来看,接受 PCI 或药物治疗的成本和获益。我们估算了增量成本效益比(ICER),表示为质量调整生命年(QALY),ICER<¥5 百万日元/QALY 被认为是具有成本效益的。PCI 对心血管事件的影响基于以前的出版物。在 STEMI 患者中,PCI 优于药物治疗的 ICER 为每 QALY 增加 0.97 百万日元。PCI 的成本效益概率为 99.9%。在 AP 患者中,FFR 指导的 PCI 优于药物治疗的 ICER 为每 QALY 增加 4.63 百万日元。PCI 的成本效益概率为 50.4%。FFR 指导的 PCI 用于无症状患者的 ICER 为每 QALY 增加 23 百万日元。

结论

在 STEMI 患者中,与药物治疗相比,PCI 具有成本效益。在 AP 患者中,FFR 指导的 PCI 用于有症状患者可能比药物治疗更具成本效益。FFR 指导的无症状心肌缺血患者的 PCI 不具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared With Medical Therapy for Ischemic Heart Disease in Japan.日本经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗缺血性心脏病的成本效果比较。
Circ J. 2019 Jun 25;83(7):1498-1505. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0148. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Treatment for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A Prespecified Analysis of the FRAME-AMI Randomized Clinical Trial.血流储备分数指导治疗急性心肌梗死和多血管病变的成本效益:FRAME-AMI 随机临床试验的预设分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52427.
3
Cost utility of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease in Brazil.巴西多支冠状动脉疾病中血流储备分数指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本效用。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30;31(9):676-681. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy240.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Complex PCI: Prespecified Analysis of RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI Trial.血管内成像指导下复杂 PCI 的成本效益:RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI 试验的预设分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Mar;17(3):e010230. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010230. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable and Unstable Angina.基于血流储备分数的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在稳定型和不稳定型心绞痛中的长期成本效益
JACC Adv. 2022 Dec 30;1(5):100145. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100145. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Sodium Nitrite-Mediated Cardioprotection in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.亚硝酸钠介导的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的心脏保护作用:成本效果分析。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Mar;24(2):113-119. doi: 10.1177/1074248418784940. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
7
Cost-effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a UK perspective.血管内超声引导下经皮介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的成本效益:英国视角
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 Dec 19;10(8):677-688. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad073.
8
Treatment strategy modification and its implication on the medical cost of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan.日本分数血流储备指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略的修改及其对医疗费用的影响。
J Cardiol. 2019 Jan;73(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention for single-vessel coronary artery disease: an economic evaluation of the ORBITA trial.单支冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本效益分析:ORBITA试验的经济评估
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 9;11(2):e044054. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044054.
10
Prasugrel (Efient®) with percutaneous coronary intervention for treating acute coronary syndromes (review of TA182): systematic review and economic analysis.普拉格雷(Efient®)联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(TA182综述):系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(29):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta19290.

引用本文的文献

1
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for the Combination of Universal Screening at 9-10 Years Old and Reverse Cascade Screening of Relatives for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Japan.日本9至10岁普遍筛查与家族性高胆固醇血症亲属反向级联筛查相结合的成本效益分析。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2025 Aug 1;32(8):962-981. doi: 10.5551/jat.65181. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
Cost-utility analysis of combination medical therapies in chronic coronary syndrome: a comparative study using real-world and patient-level data from Iran.慢性冠状动脉综合征联合药物治疗的成本效用分析:一项使用伊朗真实世界和患者层面数据的比较研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):e081953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081953.
3
Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable and Unstable Angina.
基于血流储备分数的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在稳定型和不稳定型心绞痛中的长期成本效益
JACC Adv. 2022 Dec 30;1(5):100145. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100145. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Treatment for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A Prespecified Analysis of the FRAME-AMI Randomized Clinical Trial.血流储备分数指导治疗急性心肌梗死和多血管病变的成本效益:FRAME-AMI 随机临床试验的预设分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52427.
5
Cost-effectiveness of digital therapeutics for essential hypertension.数字疗法治疗原发性高血压的成本效益。
Hypertens Res. 2022 Oct;45(10):1538-1548. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-00952-x. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
6
Variation in the use of percutaneous coronary interventions among older patients with acute coronary syndromes: a multilevel study in Fukuoka, Japan.在日本福冈,老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的使用存在差异:一项多水平研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 16;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01415-4.
7
Medical therapy versus percutaneous coronary intervention in ischemic heart disease: A cost-effectiveness analysis.缺血性心脏病的药物治疗与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:成本效益分析。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Nov 16;34:155. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.34.155. eCollection 2020.
8
The Efficacy and Safety of Compound Danshen Dripping Pill Combined with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Heart Disease.复方丹参滴丸联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠心病的疗效及安全性
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Nov 17;2020:5067137. doi: 10.1155/2020/5067137. eCollection 2020.