Patel Dil V, Yoo Joon S, Block Andrew M, Karmarkar Sailee S, Lamoutte Eric H, Singh Kern
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Dec;32(10):E453-E456. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000847.
This was a retrospective study.
To determine whether an association exists between preoperative patient activation, as measured by the 10-Item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-10), and postoperative outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Patient motivation in maintaining positive health behaviors, a concept known as patient activation, has been established as an indicator for improvement in pain, disability, and physical function after surgery. However, no studies examine the effect of preoperative patient activation scores on outcomes following ACDF.
A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed and included patients that had a primary, 1-3 level ACDF for degenerative pathology. Patients were categorized into 3 subgroups according to their preoperative PAM-10 scores as follows: "low PAM" (bottom quartile), "moderate PAM" (second and third quartile), and "high PAM" (top quartile). Demographics and perioperative characteristics were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes including Neck Disability Index, 12-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) neck and arm pain were collected preoperatively and at 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month postoperative follow-up.
A total of 64 patients were included in this analysis. Patients were stratified by their PAM scores as follows: 25 had a low PAM score, 19 had a moderate PAM score, and 20 had a high PAM score. There was no difference in inpatient VAS pain scores or narcotic consumption. In addition, there was no difference in improvement in VAS neck pain, VAS arm pain, Neck Disability Index, and SF-12 PCS among subgroups at all postoperative follow-ups.
Although PAM has been associated with better postoperative recovery in lumbar spine patients and other orthopedic surgeries, our investigation suggests that preoperative PAM assessments are not an effective method to predict postoperative outcomes following an ACDF.
这是一项回顾性研究。
确定通过10项患者激活量表(PAM - 10)测量的术前患者激活水平与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)术后结果之间是否存在关联。
患者维持积极健康行为的动机,即所谓的患者激活,已被确立为手术后疼痛、残疾和身体功能改善的指标。然而,尚无研究探讨术前患者激活分数对ACDF术后结果的影响。
对一个前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性审查,纳入因退行性病变接受初次1 - 3节段ACDF的患者。根据术前PAM - 10分数将患者分为3个亚组:“低PAM”(四分位最低组)、“中度PAM”(第二和第三四分位组)和“高PAM”(四分位最高组)。记录人口统计学和围手术期特征。收集患者报告的结果,包括颈部残疾指数、12项简短身体成分评分(SF - 12 PCS)以及术前和术后6周、3个月、6个月及12个月随访时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)颈部和手臂疼痛评分。
本分析共纳入64例患者。患者按PAM分数分层如下:25例PAM分数低,19例PAM分数中等,20例PAM分数高。住院期间VAS疼痛评分或麻醉药物消耗量无差异。此外,在所有术后随访中,各亚组之间VAS颈部疼痛、VAS手臂疼痛、颈部残疾指数和SF - 12 PCS的改善情况也无差异。
尽管PAM与腰椎患者及其他骨科手术更好的术后恢复相关,但我们的研究表明,术前PAM评估并非预测ACDF术后结果的有效方法。