Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida.
Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Surg Res. 2019 Nov;243:108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
Conflicting data on the microbiology and epidemiology of necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) appear to stem from the heterogeneity in microbiology observed in regions across the United States. Our goal was to determine current differences in organism prevalence and outcomes for NSTI and non-necrotizing severe soft tissue infections across the United States. We hypothesized that there were geographical differences in organism prevalence that would lead to differences in outcomes.
This study was a retrospective multi-institutional trial from centers across the United States and Canada. Demographic, clinical, and outcomes data were collected. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the effects of region and microbiology on outcomes.
A total of 622 patients were included in this study. Polymicrobial infections (45%) were the most prevalent infections in all regions. On bivariate analysis, Clostridium and polymicrobial infections had higher mean Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis scores and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grades (P < 0.001 for both) than other organisms. Patients in the South were more likely to be uninsured and had worse unadjusted outcomes. In a risk-adjusted model, increasing American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade was predictive of mortality (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.1; P < 0.001), as was age ≥ 55 y (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.3, P = 0.006), but region and organism type were not associated with mortality.
We found important regional differences with respect to organism type and demographics. However, on risk-adjusted models, neither region nor organism type predicted mortality.
关于坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)的微生物学和流行病学的数据相互矛盾,这似乎源于美国不同地区观察到的微生物学异质性。我们的目标是确定美国各地 NSTI 和非坏死性严重软组织感染的当前病原体流行率和结果差异。我们假设,病原体流行率存在地域差异,这将导致结果的差异。
这是一项来自美国和加拿大多个中心的回顾性多机构试验。收集了人口统计学、临床和结局数据。进行了双变量和多变量分析,以确定区域和微生物学对结局的影响。
本研究共纳入 622 例患者。所有地区最常见的感染是混合感染(45%)。在单变量分析中,梭菌和混合感染的实验室风险指标对坏死性筋膜炎评分和美国外科医师协会创伤分级的平均值较高(两者均 P < 0.001)。南部的患者更可能没有保险,且调整前结局较差。在风险调整模型中,美国外科医师协会创伤分级的增加与死亡率相关(比值比,2.3;95%置信区间,1.6-3.1;P < 0.001),年龄≥55 岁也是如此(比值比,2.7;95%置信区间,1.3-5.3,P = 0.006),但区域和病原体类型与死亡率无关。
我们发现了与病原体类型和人口统计学有关的重要区域差异。然而,在风险调整模型中,区域和病原体类型均不能预测死亡率。