• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

4 cm 至 7 cm 肾细胞癌行部分切除术与根治性切除术的长期随访和围手术期结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of the long-term follow-up and perioperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for 4 cm to 7 cm renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Hang Zhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 310015, China.

School of Medicine, Hang Zhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 310016, China.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0480-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-019-0480-6
PMID:31174522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6554915/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of partial nephrectomy (PN) for T1b renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. The oncological outcomes, the change in postoperative renal function and the perioperative complications are unclear.

METHODS

We searched PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for studies from March 1998 to March 2018 for studies comparing PN to radical nephrectomy (RN) for the treatment of T1b RCC. After data extraction and quality assessment, we used RevMan 5.2 to pool the data. Then, we used Stata 12.0 to perform sensitivity analyses and meta-regression. We used the GRADE profiler to evaluate the evidence according to the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 33,117 patients were included in our meta-analysis. No significant difference was found in the 5-year overall survival (OS), 10-year OS, 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 10-year RFS. The 5-year cancer-special survival (CSS) and 10-year CSS were better in RN compared to PN, respectively, at RR = 1.02, P < 0.05 and RR = 1.04, P < 0.05. PN was better than RN in the preservation of renal function (WMD = -9.15, 95% CI: - 10.30 to - 7.99, P < 0.05). The confidence level grading of the evidence was moderate for 5-year OS, 10-year OS, 5-year CSS, 10-year CSS, 5-year RFS, 10-year RFS, tumor recurrence, decline in eGFR, and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

PN may provide comparable outcomes in terms of RFS & OS, and better renal function preservation although CSS was worse.

摘要

背景

部分肾切除术(PN)治疗 T1b 期肾细胞癌(RCC)的疗效存在争议。其肿瘤学结果、术后肾功能变化和围手术期并发症尚不清楚。

方法

我们检索了 PUBMED、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 中央注册中心 1998 年 3 月至 2018 年 3 月期间的研究,以比较 PN 与根治性肾切除术(RN)治疗 T1bRCC 的疗效。在数据提取和质量评估后,我们使用 RevMan5.2 对数据进行汇总。然后,我们使用 Stata12.0 进行敏感性分析和元回归。我们使用 GRADE 专用工具根据 GRADE 方法评估证据质量。

结果

共有 16 项研究,涉及 33117 名患者纳入本荟萃分析。5 年总生存率(OS)、10 年 OS、5 年无复发生存率(RFS)和 10 年 RFS 无显著差异。RN 组的 5 年癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和 10 年 CSS 分别优于 PN 组,RR=1.02,P<0.05 和 RR=1.04,P<0.05。PN 在保护肾功能方面优于 RN(WMD=-9.15,95%CI:-10.30 至-7.99,P<0.05)。5 年 OS、10 年 OS、5 年 CSS、10 年 CSS、5 年 RFS、10 年 RFS、肿瘤复发、eGFR 下降和术后并发症的证据置信水平分级为中级。

结论

PN 可能在 RFS 和 OS 方面提供相似的结果,并且保留肾功能更好,尽管 CSS 较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/272aa9c63b07/12894_2019_480_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/820da8426dcb/12894_2019_480_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/318c81c086c3/12894_2019_480_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/14db38a3f2b7/12894_2019_480_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/fd86e1ce8592/12894_2019_480_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/42dcddeeb697/12894_2019_480_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/e80f288b746b/12894_2019_480_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/9a8d050d7cce/12894_2019_480_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/ee3f66188fc0/12894_2019_480_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/c5c61e9d1d83/12894_2019_480_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/272aa9c63b07/12894_2019_480_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/820da8426dcb/12894_2019_480_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/318c81c086c3/12894_2019_480_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/14db38a3f2b7/12894_2019_480_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/fd86e1ce8592/12894_2019_480_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/42dcddeeb697/12894_2019_480_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/e80f288b746b/12894_2019_480_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/9a8d050d7cce/12894_2019_480_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/ee3f66188fc0/12894_2019_480_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/c5c61e9d1d83/12894_2019_480_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af54/6554915/272aa9c63b07/12894_2019_480_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the long-term follow-up and perioperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for 4 cm to 7 cm renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.4 cm 至 7 cm 肾细胞癌行部分切除术与根治性切除术的长期随访和围手术期结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0480-6.
2
Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b and T2 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗 T1b 和 T2 期临床肾肿瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
3
Partial nephrectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes and better renal function preservation than radical nephrectomy for pathological T3a renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术相比,可为病理 T3a 肾细胞癌患者提供等效的肿瘤学结果并更好地保留肾功能:一项荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):46-60. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0167.
4
Comparison of oncologic outcomes between partial and radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.局限性肾细胞癌行部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的肿瘤学结局比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;25(4):385-393. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
5
Comparison of prognosis between patients undergoing radical nephrectomy versus partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma ≤7 cm T3aN0/xM0: Survival benefit is biased toward partial nephrectomy.比较 T3aN0/xM0 期肾细胞癌≤7cm 行根治性肾切除术与部分肾切除术患者的预后:生存获益偏向于部分肾切除术。
Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(24):8909-8923. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4412. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
6
Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for large (≥ 7 cm) renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗大(≥7cm)肾肿瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Apr;37(4):263-272. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Recurrence after radical and partial nephrectomy in high complex renal tumor using propensity score matched analysis.采用倾向评分匹配分析比较高复杂性肾肿瘤行根治性肾切除术与部分肾切除术的复发情况。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2919. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82700-8.
8
Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach.美国 T1bN0M0 期肾细胞癌(RCC)采用部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术治疗后的生存:倾向评分法。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1457-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10597.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
9
Overall survival and oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for cT2a renal tumors: A collaborative international study from the French kidney cancer research network UroCCR.cT2a期肾肿瘤行部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术后的总生存期及肿瘤学结局:法国肾癌研究网络UroCCR的一项国际合作研究
Prog Urol. 2018 Mar;28(3):146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2017.12.004. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
10
Oncologic and Functional Outcomes after Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy in T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Matched Case-Control Study in Korean Patients.T1b 期肾细胞癌行部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局:韩国患者的多中心匹配病例对照研究。
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;48(2):612-20. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.122. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Strategies in Renal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Partial vs. Radical Nephrectomy Outcomes Across Tumor Stages.肾癌的手术策略:一项关于不同肿瘤分期下部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术结果的荟萃分析
Qatar Med J. 2025 Jun 9;2025(2):54. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2025.54. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative outcomes of retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for cT1 and cT2 renal tumors: a single-center experience.cT1和cT2期肾肿瘤行腹膜后部分肾切除术的比较结果:单中心经验
BMC Urol. 2025 May 2;25(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01786-8.
3
Renal cell cancer treatment: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) surgery-focused consensus update.

本文引用的文献

1
Partial versus radical nephrectomy for T1b-2N0M0 renal tumors: A propensity score matching study based on the SEER database.基于 SEER 数据库的 T1b-2N0M0 肾肿瘤的部分切除术与根治性切除术比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0193530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193530. eCollection 2018.
2
Histopathologic analysis of tumor bed and peritumoral pseudocapsule after in vitro tumor enucleation on radical nephrectomy specimen for clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma.对临床T1b期肾细胞癌根治性肾切除标本进行体外肿瘤剜除术后肿瘤床和瘤周假包膜的组织病理学分析。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Oct;35(10):603.e15-603.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
3
肾细胞癌治疗:拉丁美洲肿瘤协作组(LACOG)和拉丁美洲肾癌组(LARCG)以手术为重点的共识更新
Ther Adv Urol. 2025 Apr 14;17:17562872241312581. doi: 10.1177/17562872241312581. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Is Partial Nephrectomy A Primary Option for Patients with T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma-A National Population-Based Study.肾部分切除术是T1b期肾细胞癌患者的首选治疗方式吗?一项基于全国人口的研究
Urol Res Pract. 2025 Apr 4;50(6):322-327. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.24081.
5
Comparison of Outcomes Between Partial and Radical Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors Larger Than Four Centimeters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.局部大于4厘米的肾肿瘤行腹腔镜部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Oncol. 2024 Aug;15(4):625-639. doi: 10.14740/wjon1866. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
6
Preoperative prediction of renal fibrous capsule invasion in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using CT-based radiomics model.基于 CT 影像组学模型预测透明细胞肾细胞癌肾纤维囊侵犯的术前预测。
Br J Radiol. 2024 Sep 1;97(1161):1557-1567. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae122.
7
Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma: A single‑center study.肾细胞癌的预后因素:一项单中心研究。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 14;19(3):66. doi: 10.3892/mco.2023.2662. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis.铥激光与钬激光碎石术治疗上尿路结石的前瞻性比较
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Mar 21;51:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.012. eCollection 2023 May.
9
A multicenter comparative matched-pair analysis of percutaneous tumor ablation and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy of T1b renal cell carcinoma (AblatT1b study-UroCCR 80).多中心对比配对分析经皮肿瘤消融术与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗 T1b 期肾细胞癌(AblatT1b 研究-UroCCR80)。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Sep;33(9):6513-6521. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09564-6. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
10
A clinical investigation of recurrence and lost follow-up after renal cell carcinoma surgery: a single-center, long-term, large cohort, retrospective study.肾细胞癌手术后复发及失访的临床研究:一项单中心、长期、大样本队列回顾性研究
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep;27(9):1467-1476. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02204-x. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
Can partial nephrectomy provide equal oncological efficiency and safety compared with radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (≥4cm)? A propensity score-matched study.
对于肾细胞癌(≥4cm)患者,与根治性肾切除术相比,部分肾切除术能否提供同等的肿瘤学疗效和安全性?一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Jun;35(6):379-385. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b and T2 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗 T1b 和 T2 期临床肾肿瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
5
Oncologic and Functional Outcomes after Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy in T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Matched Case-Control Study in Korean Patients.T1b 期肾细胞癌行部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局:韩国患者的多中心匹配病例对照研究。
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;48(2):612-20. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.122. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
6
Partial vs radical nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: an analysis from the British Association of Urological Surgeons Nephrectomy Audit.T1期肾肿瘤行部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的比较:来自英国泌尿外科医师协会肾切除术审计的分析
BJU Int. 2016 Jan;117(1):62-71. doi: 10.1111/bju.13114. Epub 2015 May 13.
7
EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.EAU 指南:肾细胞癌. 2014 年更新版.
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
8
Nephron-sparing surgery is superior to radical nephrectomy in preserving renal function benefit even when expanding indications beyond the traditional 4-cm cutoff.即使将适应症扩大到超过传统的4厘米界限,保留肾单位手术在保护肾功能方面也优于根治性肾切除术。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Oct;32(7):1024-30. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
9
Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904.保肾手术与根治性肾切除术对肾功能的影响:EORTC 随机试验 30904 的结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.044. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
10
Partial and radical nephrectomy provide comparable long-term cancer control for T1b renal cell carcinoma.部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术为 T1b 期肾细胞癌提供了相似的长期肿瘤控制效果。
Int J Urol. 2014 Feb;21(2):122-8. doi: 10.1111/iju.12204. Epub 2013 Jul 2.