• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用倾向评分匹配分析比较高复杂性肾肿瘤行根治性肾切除术与部分肾切除术的复发情况。

Recurrence after radical and partial nephrectomy in high complex renal tumor using propensity score matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-Ro, 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.

Biochemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, Boston College, Newton, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2919. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82700-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-82700-8
PMID:33536492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7859240/
Abstract

We evaluated the recurrence after radical and partial nephrectomy in patients with RENAL nephrometry score [RENAL] ≥ 10. A total of 474 patients (radical nephrectomy [RN, n = 236] & partial nephrectomy [PN, n = 238]) in a single tertiary referral institution from December 2003 to December 2019 were assessed. Functional outcomes, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate changes, relapse pattern, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using propensity score-matched analysis. The predictors of recurrence and survival were assessed by Cox-regression analysis. 44 patients in the RN group and 88 in the PN group were included without significant differences in preoperative clinical factors after matching. The PN patients achieved significantly higher renal function preservation rates (p < 0.001). There were five recurrences in RN and six in PN. The PN patients revealed 5-year RFS rate (86.8%), 5-year CSS rate (98.5%), and 5-year OS rate (98.5%) comparable to the RN patients (RFS: 88.7% [p = 0.780], CSS: 96.7% [p = 0.375], and OS: 94.3% [p = 0.248]). Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 23 had lower 5-year RFS rates (85.5%) and OS rates (95.6%) than those with BMI < 23 (RFS: 90.0% [p = 0.195], OS: 100% [p = 0.117]) without significance. The significant predictor of recurrence was the pathologic T stage (hazard ratio [HR] 3.99, 95% confidence [CI] 1.10-14.50, p = 0.036). The significant predictor of death was the R domain of the RENAL (HR 3.80, 95% CI 1.03-14.11, p = 0.046). PN, if technically feasible, could be considered to preserve renal function in patients with RENAL ≥ 10. Nonetheless, PN needs to be implemented with caution in some patients due to the higher potentiality for recurrence and poor survival.

摘要

我们评估了 RENAL 评分 [RENAL]≥10 的患者接受根治性肾切除术和部分肾切除术的复发情况。在 2003 年 12 月至 2019 年 12 月期间,我们对来自单一三级转诊机构的 474 名患者(根治性肾切除术 [RN,n=236]和部分肾切除术 [PN,n=238])进行了评估。采用倾向评分匹配分析评估功能结局(定义为估算肾小球滤过率变化)、复发模式、无复发生存率(RFS)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)。采用 Cox 回归分析评估复发和生存的预测因素。在匹配后,RN 组 44 例患者和 PN 组 88 例患者在术前临床因素方面无显著差异。PN 患者的肾功能保留率明显更高(p<0.001)。RN 组有 5 例复发,PN 组有 6 例复发。PN 患者的 5 年 RFS 率(86.8%)、5 年 CSS 率(98.5%)和 5 年 OS 率(98.5%)与 RN 患者相当(RFS:88.7%[p=0.780],CSS:96.7%[p=0.375],OS:94.3%[p=0.248])。BMI≥23 的患者 5 年 RFS 率(85.5%)和 OS 率(95.6%)均低于 BMI<23 的患者(RFS:90.0%[p=0.195],OS:100%[p=0.117]),但无统计学意义。复发的显著预测因素是病理 T 分期(危险比 [HR]3.99,95%置信区间 [CI]1.10-14.50,p=0.036)。死亡的显著预测因素是 RENAL 的 R 域(HR3.80,95%CI1.03-14.11,p=0.046)。如果技术上可行,PN 可考虑用于保留 RENAL≥10 的患者的肾功能。然而,由于复发和生存较差的可能性较高,PN 在某些患者中需要谨慎实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2e8/7859240/6c1da2be1a10/41598_2021_82700_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2e8/7859240/2583b71cfd0f/41598_2021_82700_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2e8/7859240/6c1da2be1a10/41598_2021_82700_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2e8/7859240/2583b71cfd0f/41598_2021_82700_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2e8/7859240/6c1da2be1a10/41598_2021_82700_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Recurrence after radical and partial nephrectomy in high complex renal tumor using propensity score matched analysis.采用倾向评分匹配分析比较高复杂性肾肿瘤行根治性肾切除术与部分肾切除术的复发情况。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2919. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82700-8.
2
Cancer control of partial nephrectomy for high-risk localized renal cell carcinoma: population-based and single-institutional analysis.高危局限性肾细胞癌部分肾切除术的癌症控制:基于人群和单机构分析
World J Urol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1807-14. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1538-z. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
3
Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b and T2 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗 T1b 和 T2 期临床肾肿瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
4
Partial nephrectomy is not associated with an overall survival advantage over radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with stage Ib-II renal masses: An analysis of the national cancer data base.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术相比,在老年 Ib-II 期肾肿块患者中并不具有总体生存优势:国家癌症数据库分析。
Cancer. 2018 Oct 1;124(19):3839-3848. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31582. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Comparison of survival rates in stage 1 renal cell carcinoma between partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy patients according to age distribution: a propensity score matching study.根据年龄分布比较部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术患者的Ⅰ期肾细胞癌生存率:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6B):E52-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13200. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Overall survival and oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for cT2a renal tumors: A collaborative international study from the French kidney cancer research network UroCCR.cT2a期肾肿瘤行部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术后的总生存期及肿瘤学结局:法国肾癌研究网络UroCCR的一项国际合作研究
Prog Urol. 2018 Mar;28(3):146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2017.12.004. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
7
Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach.美国 T1bN0M0 期肾细胞癌(RCC)采用部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术治疗后的生存:倾向评分法。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1457-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10597.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
8
Oncological outcomes of minimally invasive partial versus minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for cT1-2/N0/M0 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.cT1-2/N0/M0期透明细胞肾细胞癌行微创部分肾切除术与微创根治性肾切除术的肿瘤学结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
World J Urol. 2017 May;35(5):789-794. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1923-2. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
9
Preserving Renal Function through Partial Nephrectomy Depends on Tumor Complexity in T1b Renal Tumors.通过部分肾切除术保留肾功能取决于T1b期肾肿瘤的肿瘤复杂性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Mar;32(3):495-501. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.3.495.
10
Overall survival and renal function after partial and radical nephrectomy among older patients with localised renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched multicentre study.老年局限性肾细胞癌患者行部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术后的总生存期和肾功能:一项倾向匹配的多中心研究
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Mar;51(4):489-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Strategies in Renal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Partial vs. Radical Nephrectomy Outcomes Across Tumor Stages.肾癌的手术策略:一项关于不同肿瘤分期下部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术结果的荟萃分析
Qatar Med J. 2025 Jun 9;2025(2):54. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2025.54. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative outcomes of retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for cT1 and cT2 renal tumors: a single-center experience.cT1和cT2期肾肿瘤行腹膜后部分肾切除术的比较结果:单中心经验
BMC Urol. 2025 May 2;25(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01786-8.
3
The Prognostic Impact of the Surgical Margin in Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Partial Nephrectomy: A Multi-Center Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic partial nephrectomy vs minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass: a propensity score-matched comparison from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group.机器人辅助部分肾切除术与微创根治性肾切除术治疗临床 T2a 期肾肿瘤:来自 ROSULA(机器人治疗大肾肿瘤)协作组的倾向评分匹配比较。
BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):114-123. doi: 10.1111/bju.15064. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
2
Transcriptomic signatures related to the obesity paradox in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a cohort study.与透明细胞肾细胞癌患者肥胖悖论相关的转录组特征:一项队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):283-293. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30797-1. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
3
肾部分切除术治疗肾细胞癌时手术切缘的预后影响:一项多中心研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 9;16(8):1449. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081449.
4
Predicting new-baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after donor nephrectomy: validation of a split renal function (SRF)-based formula.预测供肾切术后的新基础肾小球滤过率(NBGFR):基于分肾功能(SRF)公式的验证。
World J Urol. 2024 Jan 20;42(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04759-4.
5
A novel nomogram and prognostic factor for metastatic renal cell carcinoma survival in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)时代转移性肾细胞癌生存的新型列线图及预后因素
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 4;13:996404. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.996404. eCollection 2022.
6
Pleiotropic effects of DCLK1 in cancer and cancer stem cells.DCLK1在癌症和癌症干细胞中的多效性作用。
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Sep 26;9:965730. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.965730. eCollection 2022.
7
Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis.肾内生性肿瘤行部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的比较:倾向评分匹配分析对手术、功能及肿瘤学结局的比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 26;12:916018. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.916018. eCollection 2022.
8
The R.E.N.A.L score's relevance in determining perioperative and oncological outcomes: a Middle-Eastern tertiary care center experience.R.E.N.A.L评分在确定围手术期和肿瘤学结局中的相关性:中东三级医疗中心的经验。
Arab J Urol. 2022 Apr 17;20(3):115-120. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2064041. eCollection 2022.
9
Predicting Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Survival Using Kurtosis of Cytoplasm in the Hematoxylin Channel from Histology Slides.利用苏木精通道中细胞质峰度从组织学切片预测透明细胞肾细胞癌的生存率
J Oncol. 2022 Jan 13;2022:7693993. doi: 10.1155/2022/7693993. eCollection 2022.
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2020.
NCCN 指南解读:肾癌,第 2.2020 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Nov 1;17(11):1278-1285. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0054.
4
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update.欧洲泌尿外科学会肾癌指南:2019 年更新版。
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):799-810. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
5
Comparison of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score ≥10).机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术治疗高度复杂性肾肿瘤(RENAL 肾肿瘤评分≥10)的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210413. eCollection 2019.
6
Partial nephrectomy is not associated with an overall survival advantage over radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with stage Ib-II renal masses: An analysis of the national cancer data base.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术相比,在老年 Ib-II 期肾肿块患者中并不具有总体生存优势:国家癌症数据库分析。
Cancer. 2018 Oct 1;124(19):3839-3848. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31582. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
7
Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes.机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术治疗高度复杂肾肿物:围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结局的比较
Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;36(10):471.e1-471.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
8
Local Tumor Bed Recurrence Following Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Small Renal Masses.小肾肿瘤患者行部分肾切除术治疗后的局部肿瘤床复发。
J Urol. 2018 Feb;199(2):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.072. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
9
Recurrence in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review of Contemporary Data.局限性肾细胞癌的复发:当代数据的系统评价
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Feb;18(2):15. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0661-3.
10
Patterns and Predictors of Recurrence after Partial Nephrectomy for Kidney Tumors.肾肿瘤部分肾切除术后复发的模式及预测因素
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1403-1409. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.046. Epub 2016 Dec 18.