• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独居与积极心理健康:系统评价。

Living alone and positive mental health: a systematic review.

机构信息

WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Promotion, Prevention and Policy, Mental Health unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 7;8(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1057-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-019-1057-x
PMID:31174604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6555743/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Living alone has become more common in today's societies. Despite the high number of the population living alone, research directed towards the mental wellbeing issues related to living alone has been limited. This systematic literature review aimed to assess the association between living alone and positive mental health.

METHODS

We conducted searches in Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and other complementary databases from January 1998 to May 2019. Randomised trials and observational studies investigating adults over 18 years of age and living alone (defined as living in a single household or a household size of one person) were eligible. The primary outcome was positive mental health, defined as comprising both hedonic and eudaimonic elements of mental wellbeing, and it was measured with the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale and/or theWHO-5 Index. Two reviewers independently screened and selected data; one reviewer extracted data, and the second checked the extracted data. A narrative synthesis described the quality and content of the evidence. Included studies were appraised using relevant Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 4 cross-sectional studies (22,591 adult participants) were included after screening of 341 titles and abstracts and 46 full-text articles. These studies were conducted in Europe and were published between 2014 and 2017. The studies differed in their measurements of positive mental health (WHO-5 Well-Being Index, 3 studies; WEMWBS, 1 study), sources of data (1 regional, 1 national, and 2 European-level studies), and study populations (regional study, adults over 65 years of age; national-level study, mental health nurses over 21 years of age; European-level studies, employees between 15 and 65 years of age and adults over 18 years of age). A potential association between living alone and low positive mental health was found in three out of the four studies. Our findings were limited as the number of included studies was low and the quality of evidence varied across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review allows a limited look at the association between living alone and positive mental health. Because the number of included studies was low and the quality of evidence varied across studies, further research is warranted.

摘要

背景

在当今社会,独居变得越来越普遍。尽管独居人口众多,但针对独居相关心理健康问题的研究却很有限。本系统文献综述旨在评估独居与积极心理健康之间的关系。

方法

我们检索了 Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和其他补充数据库,检索时间为 1998 年 1 月至 2019 年 5 月。纳入的研究为针对 18 岁以上成年人的随机试验和观察性研究,这些成年人独居(定义为居住在一个家庭或一个人的家庭规模)。主要结局是积极的心理健康,包括幸福感和精神幸福感的两个方面,用 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表和/或 WHO-5 指数来衡量。两名审查员独立筛选和选择数据;一名审查员提取数据,第二名审查员检查提取的数据。叙述性综述描述了证据的质量和内容。使用相关的 Joanna Briggs 研究所清单评估纳入的研究。

结果

经过筛选 341 篇标题和摘要以及 46 篇全文文章后,共纳入 4 项横断面研究(22591 名成年参与者)。这些研究在欧洲进行,发表于 2014 年至 2017 年之间。这些研究在积极心理健康的测量(WHO-5 幸福感指数,3 项研究;WEMWBS,1 项研究)、数据来源(1 项区域性、1 项全国性和 2 项欧洲水平的研究)和研究人群(区域性研究,65 岁以上成年人;全国性研究,21 岁以上的心理健康护士;欧洲水平的研究,15 至 65 岁的员工和 18 岁以上的成年人)方面存在差异。四项研究中有三项发现独居与积极心理健康之间存在潜在关联。由于纳入研究的数量较少,且研究间证据质量存在差异,我们的研究结果受到限制。

结论

本综述允许对独居与积极心理健康之间的关系进行有限的观察。由于纳入研究的数量较少,且研究间证据质量存在差异,因此需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4d/6555743/3703c00ee4aa/13643_2019_1057_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4d/6555743/3703c00ee4aa/13643_2019_1057_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4d/6555743/3703c00ee4aa/13643_2019_1057_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Living alone and positive mental health: a systematic review.独居与积极心理健康:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 7;8(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1057-x.
2
3
The association between ethnicity and delay in seeking medical care for chest pain: a systematic review.种族与胸痛就医延迟之间的关联:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jul;14(7):208-35. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003012.
4
5
6
7
Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review.参与户外自然环境中的体育活动是否比室内体育活动对身心健康有更大的影响?系统评价。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Mar 1;45(5):1761-72. doi: 10.1021/es102947t. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
8
9
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴的使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染和牙齿咬合不正的关系。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2005 Jul;3(6):147-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2005.00024.x.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping the global research landscape and trends of older people living alone: a bibliometric analysis.绘制全球独居老年人的研究格局与趋势:一项文献计量分析。
Front Aging. 2025 Jul 3;6:1524673. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1524673. eCollection 2025.
2
Living alone and provider behaviour in public and private hospitals.公立医院和私立医院中的独居情况及医疗服务提供者行为
J Health Econ. 2025 Aug;102:103016. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103016. Epub 2025 May 31.
3
Sociodemographic, Lifestyle, and Psychological Factors Associated With Flourishing Mental Health in Young Adults: Facteurs sociodémographiques, liés au mode de vie et psychologiques, associés à une bonne santé mentale chez les jeunes adultes.

本文引用的文献

1
"In the mood for ageing": determinants of subjective well-being in older men and women of the population-based KORA-Age study.“衰老情绪”:基于人群的KORA-年龄研究中老年男性和女性主观幸福感的决定因素
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jun 16;17(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0513-5.
2
Subjective well-being of mental health nurses in the United Kingdom: Results of an online survey.英国心理健康护士的主观幸福感:一项在线调查结果
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;26(4):391-401. doi: 10.1111/inm.12263. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
3
Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.
与青年心理健康良好相关的社会人口学、生活方式和心理因素:与青年心理健康良好相关的社会人口学、生活方式和心理因素。
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 17:7067437251347166. doi: 10.1177/07067437251347166.
4
Factors associated with mental health literacy and demand for mental health services among older adults in China: a cross-sectional study.中国老年人心理健康素养及心理健康服务需求的相关因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 May 15;25(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06003-7.
5
Factors affecting risk perception of COVID-19: differences by age and gender.影响新冠病毒疾病风险认知的因素:年龄和性别的差异
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 22;12:1484306. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1484306. eCollection 2024.
6
Assessment of the relationship between living alone and suicidal behaviors based on prospective studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于前瞻性研究评估独居与自杀行为之间的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;12:1444820. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1444820. eCollection 2024.
7
A Narrative Review of Compassion Focused Therapy on Positive Mental Health Outcomes.关于以同情为中心疗法对积极心理健康结果的叙述性综述。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;14(8):643. doi: 10.3390/bs14080643.
8
Heightened SAM- and HPA-axis activity during acute stress impairs decision-making: A systematic review on underlying neuropharmacological mechanisms.急性应激期间升高的SAM和HPA轴活动会损害决策:关于潜在神经药理学机制的系统评价
Neurobiol Stress. 2024 Jul 3;31:100659. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100659. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Changes in Social, Economic, and Health Risk Factors Across the Lifespan during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Latent Transition Analysis.新冠疫情期间全生命周期内社会、经济和健康风险因素的变化:一项潜在转变分析
J Prev Health Promot. 2022 Nov;3(4):539-562. doi: 10.1177/26320770221096839.
10
Association between living alone and all-cause mortality of young and middle-aged patients with acute myocardial infarction: analysis of the China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry.独居与中青年急性心肌梗死患者全因死亡率的关系:中国急性心肌梗死注册研究(CAMI)分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17486-7.
报告患病率和累积发病率数据的观察性流行病学研究系统评价的方法学指南。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):147-53. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054.
4
Socioeconomic gradients and mental health: implications for public health.社会经济梯度与心理健康:对公共卫生的启示。
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;206(6):461-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147280. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
5
Research priorities for public mental health in Europe: recommendations of the ROAMER project.欧洲公共心理健康研究重点:漫游者项目的建议
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Apr;25(2):249-54. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku232. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
6
Neo-Marxian social class inequalities in the mental well-being of employed men and women: the role of European welfare regimes.新马克思主义视角下的欧洲福利体制对就业男女心理健康的社会阶层差异的影响
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:188-200. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.027. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
7
Material, psychosocial and sociodemographic determinants are associated with positive mental health in Europe: a cross-sectional study.物质、心理社会和社会人口学决定因素与欧洲的积极心理健康相关:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 May 28;4(5):e005095. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005095.
8
To flourish or not: positive mental health and all-cause mortality.繁荣还是衰落:积极心理健康与全因死亡率。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):2164-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300918. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
9
Workshop 6--sources of bias in cross-sectional studies; summary on sources of bias for different study designs.研讨会6——横断面研究中的偏倚来源;不同研究设计的偏倚来源总结
Hong Kong Med J. 2012 Jun;18(3):226-7.
10
Living alone and antidepressant medication use: a prospective study in a working-age population.独居与抗抑郁药物使用:一项针对工作年龄人群的前瞻性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 23;12:236. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-236.