Gerontology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium; Frailty in Ageing research department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium; SOMT University of Physiotherapy, Softwareweg 5, 3821 BN, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Electronics and Informatics department, ETRO, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium; imec, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Gait Posture. 2019 Jul;72:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 May 27.
Only a portion of the increased variability in gait parameters observed in ageing can be explained by age and gait speed alone. Other factors, like musculoskeletal changes of the spine, might contribute to higher variability of gait parameters, slower walking speed and subsequently increased fall-risk in ageing.
Are spinal posture and mobility related to 3D-accelerometry based gait analysis, functional performance and fall-risk in ageing?
Forty elderly presenting increased fall-risk (OFR, 80.6 ± 5.4yrs), 41 old controls (OC, 79.1 ± 4.9yrs), and 40 young controls (YC, 21.6 ± 1.4yrs) were assessed for spinal posture and mobility (SpinalMouse®), gait analysis (DynaPort MiniMod), and functional performance (grip strength, grip work, timed-get-up-and-go-test, performance-oriented mobility assessment).
Compared to OC, OFR showed significantly (p < .05) larger trunk inclination angle (INC), smaller sacral extension mobility, slower walking speed, and lower medio-lateral step and stride regularity. Thoracic kyphosis angle (TKA) was similar in all groups. INC and sacral extension mobility showed the highest correlation with walking speed, gait parameters, functional performance and fall-risk. INC (OR = 1.14) and sacral extension mobility (OR = 1.12) can moderately explain fall-risk in elderly participants and showed fair capacity to discriminate OFR from OC, the diagnostic value on fall-risk is however low (best probabilistic cut-off value, INC: -0.83° [sensitivity = 70%, specificity = 61%, PPV = 64%, NPV = 68%, LR+ = 1.79, LR- = 0.49, AUC = 0.71]; sacral extension mobility: 8.5° [sensitivity = 70%, specificity = 73%, PPV = 72%, NPV = 71%, LR+ = 2.61, LR -= 0.41, AUC = 0.71]).
Larger trunk inclination and smaller sacral extension mobility (i.e. hip extension mobility) are moderately related to increased fall-risk, gait alterations, lower muscle performance and worse functional mobility in ageing. Contrary to our hypothesis, TKA showed no relation with parameters of gait and/or fall-risk. INC and sacral extension mobility have fair discriminative power to distinguish older persons with increased fall-risk from those without and might be considered as therapeutic targets.
仅通过年龄和步速无法解释观察到的步态参数变化的全部原因。其他因素,如脊柱的肌肉骨骼变化,可能导致步态参数的更高变异性、步行速度更慢以及衰老后跌倒风险增加。
脊柱姿势和活动度与基于 3D 加速度计的步态分析、功能表现和衰老中的跌倒风险有关吗?
评估 40 名有较高跌倒风险的老年人(OFR,80.6±5.4 岁)、41 名老年对照组(OC,79.1±4.9 岁)和 40 名年轻对照组(YC,21.6±1.4 岁)的脊柱姿势和活动度(SpinalMouse®)、步态分析(DynaPort MiniMod)和功能表现(握力、握力功、起身行走测试、基于表现的移动性评估)。
与 OC 相比,OFR 显示出明显更大的躯干倾斜角度(INC)、更小的骶骨伸展活动度、更慢的步行速度和更低的中侧步和步幅规律性。各组的胸椎后凸角度(TKA)相似。INC 和骶骨伸展活动度与步行速度、步态参数、功能表现和跌倒风险相关性最高。INC(OR=1.14)和骶骨伸展活动度(OR=1.12)可适度解释老年人的跌倒风险,且具有区分 OFR 和 OC 的良好能力,但对跌倒风险的诊断价值较低(最佳概率截断值,INC:-0.83°[灵敏度=70%,特异性=61%,PPV=64%,NPV=68%,LR+=1.79,LR-=0.49,AUC=0.71];骶骨伸展活动度:8.5°[灵敏度=70%,特异性=73%,PPV=72%,NPV=71%,LR+=2.61,LR-=0.41,AUC=0.71])。
更大的躯干倾斜度和更小的骶骨伸展活动度(即髋关节伸展活动度)与衰老中跌倒风险增加、步态改变、肌肉功能下降和功能移动性下降相关。与我们的假设相反,TKA 与步态参数和/或跌倒风险无关。INC 和骶骨伸展活动度具有良好的区分能力,可以区分有较高跌倒风险的老年人和没有较高跌倒风险的老年人,并且可能被视为治疗靶点。