Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; Department of Healthcare Leadership & Management, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
J Diabetes Complications. 2019 Aug;33(8):567-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 10.
To compare loop diuretic use in patients with comorbid heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) newly initiated on sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is) versus other oral anti-glycemic agents (AGAs).
This analysis used 2013-2015 MarketScan Medicare Supplemental claims data. HF and T2D patients were identified and SGLT2I users were propensity score matched to other AGA users. The mean daily dose of loop diuretics in furosemide equivalents was ascertained. For those not on baseline loop diuretics, new use was compared between cohorts. For those on baseline loop diuretics, we assessed patterns of use (increased dose, decreased dose, stable dose, no longer using) at 12-months.
A total of 750 SGLT2I users were matched to 750 other AGA users. The distribution of loop diuretic use at mean doses of 0 mg (i.e., no use), ≤20 mg, >20 mg-40 mg, >40 mg-80 mg and >80 mg/day did not differ between cohorts at baseline or 12-months (p > 0.05 for both). SGLT2I use was associated with less new loop diuretic use (22.7% [79/348] vs. 34.0% [132/388]; p = 0.001). For those on loop diuretics at baseline (n = 764), patterns of use at 12-months did not differ between cohorts (p = 0.14).
New loop diuretic use was less frequent among SGLT2I users; however, patterns of loop diuretic use did not differ between cohorts in those on loop diuretics at baseline.
比较新启用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)与其他口服降糖药(AGA)的伴有合并心力衰竭(HF)和 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的患者中,利尿剂的使用情况。
本分析使用了 2013-2015 年 MarketScan 医疗保险补充数据。确定 HF 和 T2D 患者,并通过倾向评分匹配 SGLT2i 使用者与其他 AGA 使用者。以呋塞米当量确定袢利尿剂的平均日剂量。对于基线时未使用袢利尿剂的患者,比较两个队列中新用的情况。对于基线时使用袢利尿剂的患者,我们评估了 12 个月时的使用模式(增加剂量、减少剂量、剂量稳定、不再使用)。
共有 750 名 SGLT2i 使用者与 750 名其他 AGA 使用者相匹配。在基线或 12 个月时,以 0mg(即无使用)、≤20mg、>20mg-40mg、>40mg-80mg 和>80mg/天的剂量分布,在两个队列中并无差异(均 p>0.05)。SGLT2i 的使用与较少的新袢利尿剂使用相关(22.7%[79/348]vs.34.0%[132/388];p=0.001)。对于基线时使用袢利尿剂的患者(n=764),在 12 个月时,两个队列的使用模式无差异(p=0.14)。
新的袢利尿剂使用在 SGLT2i 使用者中较不常见;然而,在基线时使用袢利尿剂的患者中,两个队列的袢利尿剂使用模式并无差异。