Baxter Ronald D, Tecson Kristen M, Still Sasha, Collier Justin D G, Felius Joost, Joseph Susan M, Hall Shelley A, Lima Brian
Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 6):S864-S870. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.155.
Right heart failure (RHF) is a well-known consequence of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement, and has been linked to negative surgical outcomes. However, little is known regarding risk factors associated with RHF. This article delineates pre- and intra-operative risk factors for RHF following LVAD implantation and demonstrates the effect of RHF severity on key surgical outcomes.
We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive LVAD patients treated at our center between 2008 and 2016. RHF was categorized using the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) definition of none/mild, moderate, severe, and acute-severe. We constructed a predictive model using multivariable logistic regression and performed a competing risks analysis for survival stratified by RHF severity.
Of 202 subjects, 52 (25.7%) developed moderate or worse RHF. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time and nadir hematocrit contributed jointly to the model of RHF severity (moderate or worse none/mild; area under the curve =0.77). Postoperative length of stay (LOS) was shortest in the non/mild group and longest in the acute-severe group (median 13 29.5 days; P<0.001). Stage 2/3 acute kidney injury (range, 26-57%, P=0.002), respiratory failure (13-94%, P<0.001), stroke (0-32%, P=0.02), and 1-year mortality (19-64%, P=0.002) differed by severity. Those with acute-severe RHF had 5.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.5-11.8] times the risk of 1-year mortality compared to those who did not have RHF.
RHF remains a postoperative threat and is associated with worsened surgical outcomes. Ongoing research will reveal further opportunities to mitigate RHF post-LVAD.
右心衰竭(RHF)是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后众所周知的后果,并且与不良手术结局相关。然而,关于与RHF相关的危险因素知之甚少。本文阐述了LVAD植入术后RHF的术前和术中危险因素,并证明了RHF严重程度对关键手术结局的影响。
我们对2008年至2016年在我们中心接受治疗的连续LVAD患者进行了回顾性分析。使用机构间机械辅助循环支持注册中心(INTERMACS)对无/轻度、中度、重度和急性重度的定义对RHF进行分类。我们使用多变量逻辑回归构建了一个预测模型,并对按RHF严重程度分层的生存情况进行了竞争风险分析。
在202名受试者中,52名(25.7%)发生了中度或更严重的RHF。体外循环(CPB)时间和最低血细胞比容共同影响RHF严重程度模型(中度或更严重对无/轻度;曲线下面积=0.77)。术后住院时间(LOS)在非/轻度组最短,在急性重度组最长(中位数13对29.5天;P<0.001)。2/3期急性肾损伤(范围26%-57%,P=0.002)、呼吸衰竭(13%-94%,P<0.001)、中风(0%-32%,P=0.02)和1年死亡率(19%-64%,P=0.002)因严重程度而异。与没有RHF的患者相比,急性重度RHF患者的1年死亡风险高5.4倍[95%置信区间(CI),2.5-11.8]。
RHF仍然是术后的一个威胁,并与更差的手术结局相关。正在进行的研究将揭示减轻LVAD术后RHF的更多机会。