Suppr超能文献

医护人员与临终患者亲属之间的沟通:一项定性证据的系统评价。

Communication between healthcare professionals and relatives of patients approaching the end-of-life: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.

机构信息

1 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.

2 Department of Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):926-941. doi: 10.1177/0269216319852007. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective communication between healthcare professionals and relatives of patients approaching the end-of-life is vital to ensure patients have a 'good death'. To improve communication, it is important to first identify how this is currently being accomplished.

AIM

To review qualitative evidence concerning characteristics of communication about prognosis and end-of-life care between healthcare professionals and relatives of patients approaching the end-of-life.

DESIGN

Qualitative systematic review (PROSPERO registration CRD42017065560) using thematic synthesis. Peer-reviewed, English language articles exploring the content of conversations and how participants communicated were included. No date restrictions were applied. Quality of included studies was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research.

DATA SOURCES

An electronic database search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and EMBASE was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one papers were included. Seven themes were identified: highlighting deterioration; involvement in decision-making, post-decision interactional work, tailoring, honesty and clarity, specific techniques for information delivery and roles of different healthcare professionals. Varied levels of family involvement in decision-making were reported. Healthcare professionals used strategies to aid understanding and collaborative decision-making, such as highlighting the patient's deterioration, referring to patient wishes and tailoring information delivery. Doctors were regarded as responsible for discussing prognosis and decision-making, and nurses for providing individualized care.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest training could provide healthcare professionals with these strategies to improve communication. Interventions such as question prompt lists could help relatives overcome barriers to involvement in decision-making. Further research is needed to understand communication with relatives in different settings and with different healthcare professionals.

摘要

背景

在接近生命末期的患者的医护人员和亲属之间进行有效的沟通对于确保患者拥有“善终”至关重要。为了改善沟通,首先确定当前如何实现这一目标非常重要。

目的

综述关于医护人员与接近生命末期的患者亲属之间关于预后和临终关怀沟通特点的定性证据。

设计

采用主题综合法的定性系统综述(PROSPERO 注册 CRD42017065560)。纳入了探讨对话内容以及参与者如何沟通的同行评审、英文文章,未对发表日期设限。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所定性研究批判性评价清单评估纳入研究的质量。

数据来源

对 CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 EMBASE 电子数据库进行了检索。

结果

共纳入 31 篇论文。确定了 7 个主题:突出恶化;参与决策、决策后互动工作、定制、诚实和清晰、信息传递的具体技术以及不同医护人员的角色。报告了不同程度的家庭参与决策的情况。医护人员使用策略来帮助理解和协作决策,例如突出患者的恶化、提及患者的意愿和定制信息传递。医生被认为负责讨论预后和决策,护士负责提供个性化护理。

结论

研究结果表明,培训可以为医护人员提供这些沟通策略。问题提示清单等干预措施可以帮助亲属克服参与决策的障碍。需要进一步研究以了解在不同环境中和与不同医护人员沟通的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e2d/6691601/b246f64f073d/10.1177_0269216319852007-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验