Heo I Re, Kim Tae Hoon, Jung Won Jai, Seong Gil Myeong, Kwon Sun Jung, Moon Jae Young, Lee Song-I, Moon Do Sik, Kim Tae-Ok, Park Chul, Choi Eun Young, Yoo Jung-Wan, Park Sunghoon, Baek Ae Rin, Lim Sung Yoon, Kim Jung Soo, Lee Jongmin, Chung Chi Ryang, Lee Sang-Min, Lee Su Hwan, Baek Moon Seong, Huh Jin Won, Cho Woo Hyun, Kim Ho Cheol
Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2025 Jul;88(3):557-565. doi: 10.4046/trd.2024.0137. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
Understanding of the life-sustaining treatment (LST) decisions in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients remains limited. This study aimed to identify factors influencing LST decisions, and compare clinical outcomes between patients with, and without, LST.
This multicenter, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1,081 COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) across Korea from January 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021. Patients were divided into LST and non-LST groups. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected and compared.
Of 1,081 patients, 207 (19.2 %) received LST. LST patients were older (median age: 76 years vs. 67 years, p<0.001), and had more comorbidities (85.5% vs. 70.4%, p<0.001), especially cardiovascular and chronic lung disease. They showed higher blood urea nitrogen, lower albumin, and elevated D-dimer levels (all p<0.05). ICU interventions, including mechanical ventilation (82.6% vs. 50.9%, p<0.001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (18.8% vs. 9.8%, p<0.001), were more common. ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in LST patients (82.6% and 94.2%, respectively, p<0.001). Logistic regression identified age (odds ratio [OR], 1.054 per year; p<0.001), mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.789; p=0.002), and ECMO use (OR, 3.580; p=0.002) as independent predictors of LST.
Age, comorbidities, and ICU interventions significantly influence LST decisions, highlighting the need for ethical and evidence-based critical care guidelines.
对重症2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者维持生命治疗(LST)决策的理解仍然有限。本研究旨在确定影响LST决策的因素,并比较接受和未接受LST患者的临床结局。
这项多中心回顾性队列研究分析了2020年1月1日至2021年8月31日期间韩国各地重症监护病房(ICU)收治的1081例COVID-19患者的数据。患者被分为LST组和非LST组。收集并比较人口统计学、临床和结局数据。
在1081例患者中,207例(19.2%)接受了LST。接受LST的患者年龄更大(中位年龄:76岁对67岁,p<0.001),合并症更多(8,5.5%对70.4%,p<0.001),尤其是心血管疾病和慢性肺病。他们的血尿素氮水平更高,白蛋白水平更低,D-二聚体水平升高(均p<0.05)。ICU干预措施,包括机械通气(82.6%对50.9%,p<0.001)和体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)(18.8%对9.8%,p<0.001)更为常见。LST患者的ICU死亡率和医院死亡率显著更高(分别为82.6%和94.2%,p<0.001)。逻辑回归确定年龄(比值比[OR],每年1.054;p<0.001)、机械通气(OR,2.789;p=0.002)和ECMO使用(OR,3.580;p=0.002)是LST的独立预测因素。
年龄、合并症和ICU干预措施显著影响LST决策,凸显了制定符合伦理和基于证据的重症监护指南的必要性。