Antinori A, Rusconi S, Gianotti N, Bini T, Mancusi D, Termini R
HIV/AIDS Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Infectious Diseases Unit, DIBIC Luigi Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 May 14;13:1667-1685. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S180981. eCollection 2019.
The protease inhibitor (PI) darunavir (DRV) has proven to be highly effective and well tolerated for HIV treatment. The DAD (Data collection on Adverse Effects of Anti-HIV Drugs) cohort showed an increased 5-year cumulative cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients given various PIs, including DRV, whereas two other recent studies found no association between DRV and CV diseases. We performed a post-hoc analysis of CV adverse events (CVAEs) in an Italian cohort, the TMC114-HIV4042 observational study, where 875 patients treated with ritonavir-boosted DRV-based regimens were followed for a total of 1,566 patient-years. We observed 23 CVAEs of any type, including 17 [12 (95%CI, 7-19) per 1,000 patient-years] primary; 14 [10 (95%CI, 5-17) per 1,000 patient-years] were primary Framingham-type general CVAEs, close to what expected according to the Framingham algorithm based on traditional risk factors. Age and systolic blood pressure (SBP) at the time of study enrolment were the only relevant (<0.01) independent predictors of CVAEs in all models; patients with any CVAE were on average 10 years older and had an SBP 14 mmHg higher than patients without CVAEs. When controlling for age and SBP, the association with other traditional factors, including serum lipids, and with HIV-specific factors was not statistically significant (>0.05). Models that also adjusted for previous ARV exposure showed no statistically significant association between any-type CVAEs and either DRV doses, 1,200 or 800 mg/daily (as also suggested by propensity score stratification), or previous DRV exposure duration. We found no evidence of a relationship between DRV use and increased CV risk.
蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)达芦那韦(DRV)已被证明在HIV治疗中具有高效性且耐受性良好。抗HIV药物不良反应数据收集(DAD)队列研究显示,包括DRV在内的接受各种PI治疗的患者5年累积心血管(CV)风险增加,而最近的另外两项研究则未发现DRV与CV疾病之间存在关联。我们对意大利一个队列(TMC114 - HIV4042观察性研究)中的CV不良事件(CVAEs)进行了事后分析,该队列中875例接受基于利托那韦增强DRV方案治疗的患者共随访了1566患者年。我们观察到23例任何类型的CVAEs,其中17例[每1000患者年12例(95%置信区间,7 - 19)]为原发性;14例[每1000患者年10例(95%置信区间,5 - 17)]为原发性弗雷明汉型一般CVAEs,接近基于传统风险因素的弗雷明汉算法预期值。在所有模型中,研究入组时的年龄和收缩压(SBP)是CVAEs唯一相关(<0.01)的独立预测因素;发生任何CVAEs的患者平均比未发生CVAEs的患者大10岁,SBP高14 mmHg。在控制年龄和SBP后,与其他传统因素(包括血脂)以及HIV特异性因素的关联无统计学意义(>0.05)。对既往抗逆转录病毒治疗(ARV)暴露情况进行调整的模型显示,任何类型的CVAEs与DRV剂量(1200或800 mg/每日)或既往DRV暴露持续时间之间均无统计学意义的关联(倾向评分分层也表明了这一点)。我们没有发现使用DRV与CV风险增加之间存在关联的证据。