Li Junling, Li Wei, Dai Xiaojian, Zhong Dafang, Ding Yaping, Chen Xiaoyan
College of Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 May 20;13:1739-1749. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S200679. eCollection 2019.
Paclitaxel protein-bound particles for injectable suspension (nab-paclitaxel) showed many advantages in safety, effectiveness, and convenience. Different from conventional formulations, the bioequivalence evaluation of nab-paclitaxel formulations requires to determine the total amount of paclitaxel in plasma and the unbound paclitaxel to reflect their in vivo disposition. This study aimed to develop an analytical method to quantify the total and unbound paclitaxel in plasma and evaluate the bioequivalence of two formulations of nab-paclitaxel in patients with breast cancer. An open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study was completed among 24 Chinese patients with breast cancer. The patients were randomized to receive either the test formulation on cycle 1 day 1 and after 21 days in cycle 2 day 1 by the reference formulation (Abraxane®), or vice versa. Rapid equilibrium dialysis was adopted to separate the unbound paclitaxel in human plasma. Total and unbound paclitaxel concentrations were measured by the validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods over the range of 5.00-15,000 and 0.200-200 ng/mL, respectively. The bioequivalence of the test formulation to the reference formulation was assessed using the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines. All the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios fell within the predetermined acceptance range. The 90% CIs for the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 h to 72 h (AUC), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC), and peak plasma concentrations (C) for total paclitaxel were 92.03%-98.05%, 91.98%-99.37%, and 91.37%-99.36%, respectively. The 90% CIs of AUC, AUC, and C for unbound paclitaxel were 86.77%-97.88%, 86.81%-97.88%, and 87.70%-98.86%, respectively. Bioequivalence between the two nab-paclitaxel formulations was confirmed for total and unbound paclitaxel at the studied dose regimen.
注射用紫杉醇白蛋白结合型微粒(纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇)在安全性、有效性和便利性方面显示出诸多优势。与传统制剂不同,纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇制剂的生物等效性评估需要测定血浆中紫杉醇的总量和游离紫杉醇,以反映其体内处置情况。本研究旨在开发一种分析方法来定量血浆中总紫杉醇和游离紫杉醇,并评估两种纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇制剂在乳腺癌患者中的生物等效性。在24例中国乳腺癌患者中完成了一项开放标签、随机、两周期交叉研究。患者被随机分为在第1周期第1天接受试验制剂,在第2周期第1天接受参比制剂(Abraxane®),21天后反之。采用快速平衡透析法分离人血浆中的游离紫杉醇。分别采用经过验证的液相色谱-串联质谱法在5.00 - 15,000 ng/mL和0.200 - 200 ng/mL范围内测定总紫杉醇和游离紫杉醇浓度。使用美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局的指南评估试验制剂与参比制剂的生物等效性。所有几何平均比值的90%置信区间(CI)均落在预定的接受范围内。总紫杉醇在0小时至72小时的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)、从零到无穷大的AUC以及血浆峰浓度(C)的90% CI分别为92.03% - 98.05%、91.98% - 99.37%和91.37% - 99.36%。游离紫杉醇的AUC、AUC和C的90% CI分别为86.77% - 97.88%、86.81% - 97.88%和87.70% - 98.86%。在所研究的剂量方案下,两种纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇制剂在总紫杉醇和游离紫杉醇方面的生物等效性得到证实。