Brazier J
Department of Community Medicine, United Medical School, Guy's Hospital, London.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 10;295(6603):898-900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6603.898.
RAWP (Resource Allocation Working Party) allows for cross boundary flows by adjusting regional or district health authorities' (DHAs) targets at an average specialty cost. The previous paper in this series examined problems for an inner city district health authority arising from RAWP cross boundary flow adjustment. This paper examines the likely importance of these and other problems for the National Health Service as a whole. Cross charging has been proposed as an alternative method of funding flows. District health authorities would receive an allocation equivalent to their RAWP target and then all non-emergency flows would be agreed between the authorities where patients live and competing authorities offering treatment at previously negotiated charges based on local estimates of each type of case. The problem of cost estimation is usually cited as a difficulty with this proposed reform, but this paper also discusses other important issues that tend to be neglected.
资源分配工作小组(RAWP)通过以平均专科成本调整地区或区卫生当局(DHA)的目标来实现跨边界流动。本系列的上一篇论文探讨了内城区卫生当局因RAWP跨边界流动调整而产生的问题。本文研究了这些问题以及其他问题对整个国民医疗服务体系可能产生的重要影响。交叉收费已被提议作为资金流动的一种替代方法。区卫生当局将获得相当于其RAWP目标的拨款,然后所有非紧急流动将在患者居住地区的当局与提供治疗的竞争当局之间商定,后者将根据对每种病例的当地估计,按照事先协商的收费标准进行收费。成本估算问题通常被认为是这项提议改革的一个难点,但本文也讨论了其他一些往往被忽视的重要问题。