Bevan G, Ingram R
Department of Community Medicine, United Medical School of Guy's Hospital, St Thomas's Campus, London.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 24;295(6605):1039-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6605.1039.
The review of the Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP) formula by the National Health Service Management Board has considered the method used to account for cross boundary flows between health authorities. There is no consensus on how this should be done subregionally, as it raises the unresolved problem of the best method of estimating the size of catchment populations. Different methods produce different population sizes when the admission rates of individuals living in different districts vary. The National Health Service/Department of Health and Social Security acute services working group on performance indicators recently considered the assumptions made by different methods in terms of admission thresholds set by hospital clinicians. More complicated methods of assessing catchment areas seem to offer little advantage over the simplest method, but none of the methods answer the underlying questions of what truly determines admission rates and whether higher admission rates are better than lower ones. Empirical research into variations in admission rates and their relation to outcomes is important for determining the fair allocation of resources in future.
国民医疗服务体系管理委员会对资源分配工作小组(RAWP)公式的审查,考虑了用于核算卫生当局之间跨界流动的方法。对于如何在次区域层面开展此项工作,目前尚无共识,因为这引发了一个尚未解决的问题,即估算集水区人口规模的最佳方法。当居住在不同地区的个体住院率不同时,不同的方法会得出不同的人口规模。国民医疗服务体系/卫生与社会保障部急性服务绩效指标工作组最近根据医院临床医生设定的住院门槛,考量了不同方法所做的假设。相较于最简单的方法,更复杂的集水区评估方法似乎没有什么优势,但没有一种方法能回答真正决定住院率的因素是什么,以及较高的住院率是否优于较低的住院率这些根本问题。对住院率差异及其与治疗结果之间关系的实证研究,对于确定未来资源的公平分配至关重要。