• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reviewing RAWP. Variations in admission rates: implications for equitable allocation of resources.审视标准化资源加权分配法。入院率的差异:对资源公平分配的影响。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 24;295(6605):1039-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6605.1039.
2
NHS resource allocation after the 1989 white paper: a critique of the research for the RAWP review.1989年白皮书之后的英国国家医疗服务体系资源分配:对区域附加需求计划(RAWP)审查研究的批判
Community Med. 1989 Aug;11(3):173-86. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042466.
3
Financial incentives of subregional RAWP.次区域拉各斯州医疗保险计划的经济激励措施。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 3;295(6602):836-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6602.836.
4
The RAWP review: pious hopes. Resource Allocation Working Party.RAWP审查:虔诚的希望。资源分配工作小组。
Lancet. 1986 Nov 8;2(8515):1087-90. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90479-4.
5
Measuring morbidity for resource allocation.衡量发病率以进行资源分配。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Sep 19;295(6600):703-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6600.703.
6
Accounting for cross boundary flows.考虑跨境流动。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 10;295(6603):898-900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6603.898.
7
How should district allocations be altered for changes in cross boundary flows?对于跨界流量的变化,地区分配应如何调整?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Jan 9;296(6615):144-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6615.144.
8
Reviewing RAWP. Is the medical service increment for teaching (SIFT) adequate?回顾标准化就诊人次。教学所需的医疗服务增量(SIFT)是否充足?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 17;295(6604):989-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6604.989.
9
Randomness in the RAWP formula: the reliability of mortality data in the allocation of National Health Service revenue.RAWP公式中的随机性:国民医疗服务体系收入分配中死亡率数据的可靠性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980 Sep;34(3):212-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.34.3.212.
10
The association between frequency of diagnostic radiological examinations and allocation of resources in the National Health Service: implications for future demand.国民医疗服务体系中诊断性放射检查频率与资源分配之间的关联:对未来需求的影响
Health Trends. 1981 Aug;13(3):73-5.

引用本文的文献

1
[Regional variations in health services: various methodological problems].[卫生服务的地区差异:各种方法学问题]
Soz Praventivmed. 1996;41(2):63-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01323084.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating catchment populations: implications for target allocations.估算集水区人口:对目标分配的影响。
Hosp Health Serv Rev. 1987 Mar;83(2):77-80.
2
North Western--a region that has lost its way.西北地区——一个迷失了方向的地区。
Health Serv J. 1986 Oct 30;96(5023):1414-5.
3
Catchment populations: the properties and accuracy of various methods for their estimation.集水区人口:各种估算方法的特性与准确性
Community Med. 1982 Aug;4(3):188-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02548809.
4
On patient need, equity, supplier-induced demand, and the need to assess the outcome of common medical practices.关于患者需求、公平性、供方诱导需求以及评估常见医疗实践结果的必要性。
Med Care. 1985 May;23(5):512-20.
5
Reviewing RAWP. Is the medical service increment for teaching (SIFT) adequate?回顾标准化就诊人次。教学所需的医疗服务增量(SIFT)是否充足?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 17;295(6604):989-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6604.989.
6
Accounting for cross boundary flows.考虑跨境流动。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 10;295(6603):898-900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6603.898.
7
Financial incentives of subregional RAWP.次区域拉各斯州医疗保险计划的经济激励措施。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 3;295(6602):836-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6602.836.
8
Making access to health care more equal: the role of general medical services.使医疗保健服务的可及性更加平等:全科医疗服务的作用。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Sep 26;295(6601):764-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6601.764.
9
Measuring morbidity for resource allocation.衡量发病率以进行资源分配。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Sep 19;295(6600):703-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6600.703.
10
Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilised in Boston?纽黑文的医院服务是否受到配给,或者波士顿的医院服务是否存在过度使用的情况?
Lancet. 1987 May 23;1(8543):1185-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92152-0.

审视标准化资源加权分配法。入院率的差异:对资源公平分配的影响。

Reviewing RAWP. Variations in admission rates: implications for equitable allocation of resources.

作者信息

Bevan G, Ingram R

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, United Medical School of Guy's Hospital, St Thomas's Campus, London.

出版信息

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 24;295(6605):1039-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6605.1039.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.295.6605.1039
PMID:3120865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1248079/
Abstract

The review of the Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP) formula by the National Health Service Management Board has considered the method used to account for cross boundary flows between health authorities. There is no consensus on how this should be done subregionally, as it raises the unresolved problem of the best method of estimating the size of catchment populations. Different methods produce different population sizes when the admission rates of individuals living in different districts vary. The National Health Service/Department of Health and Social Security acute services working group on performance indicators recently considered the assumptions made by different methods in terms of admission thresholds set by hospital clinicians. More complicated methods of assessing catchment areas seem to offer little advantage over the simplest method, but none of the methods answer the underlying questions of what truly determines admission rates and whether higher admission rates are better than lower ones. Empirical research into variations in admission rates and their relation to outcomes is important for determining the fair allocation of resources in future.

摘要

国民医疗服务体系管理委员会对资源分配工作小组(RAWP)公式的审查,考虑了用于核算卫生当局之间跨界流动的方法。对于如何在次区域层面开展此项工作,目前尚无共识,因为这引发了一个尚未解决的问题,即估算集水区人口规模的最佳方法。当居住在不同地区的个体住院率不同时,不同的方法会得出不同的人口规模。国民医疗服务体系/卫生与社会保障部急性服务绩效指标工作组最近根据医院临床医生设定的住院门槛,考量了不同方法所做的假设。相较于最简单的方法,更复杂的集水区评估方法似乎没有什么优势,但没有一种方法能回答真正决定住院率的因素是什么,以及较高的住院率是否优于较低的住院率这些根本问题。对住院率差异及其与治疗结果之间关系的实证研究,对于确定未来资源的公平分配至关重要。