Suppr超能文献

65岁及以上终末期心力衰竭患者原位心脏移植和左心室辅助装置的治疗结果

Outcomes of orthotopic heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device in patients aged 65 years or more with end-stage heart failure.

作者信息

Harmon David M, Tecson Kristen M, Jamil Aayla K, Felius Joost, Gonzalez-Stawinski Gonzalo V, Joseph Susan M, Hall Shelley A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicRochesterMinnesota.

Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor Scott & White Research InstituteDallasTexas.

出版信息

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2019 Mar 28;32(2):177-180. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1576095. eCollection 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Age has traditionally been a limiting factor for advanced heart failure (HF) therapies. Orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) age guidelines have become less restrictive, and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly utilized as destination therapy for patients ≥65 years. Although indications differ, we assessed outcomes for both modalities in this older population. We reviewed charts of consecutive advanced HF therapy recipients aged ≥65 years at our center from 2012 to 2016. Of 118 patients evaluated, 46 (39%) received an LVAD and 72 (61%) received OHT. Gender, body mass index, and rate of prior sternotomy were similar between groups; OHT recipients were younger, less likely to have diabetes mellitus, and more likely to have HF due to ischemic etiology. Forty-six percent of patients receiving LVADs were urgent need (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [INTERMACS] profile 1-2), compared to 29% of patients receiving OHT (United Network for Organ Sharing 1A criteria;  = 0.068). OHT recipients had shorter lengths of stay and better 1-year survival compared to LVAD recipients. Although many centers do not offer advanced HF therapy to patients aged ≥65 years, our results indicate that age alone should not be prohibitive for advanced HF therapy, particularly OHT.

摘要

传统上,年龄一直是晚期心力衰竭(HF)治疗的一个限制因素。原位心脏移植(OHT)的年龄指导原则已变得不那么严格,而左心室辅助装置(LVAD)越来越多地被用作65岁及以上患者的终末期治疗手段。尽管适应症有所不同,但我们评估了这一年长人群中两种治疗方式的结果。我们回顾了2012年至2016年在我们中心接受晚期HF治疗的连续≥65岁患者的病历。在118例接受评估的患者中,46例(39%)接受了LVAD,72例(61%)接受了OHT。两组之间的性别、体重指数和既往胸骨切开术发生率相似;OHT受者更年轻,患糖尿病的可能性更小,因缺血性病因导致HF的可能性更大。接受LVAD的患者中有46%为紧急需求(机械辅助循环支持机构间注册[INTERMACS]概况1 - 2),而接受OHT的患者中这一比例为29%(器官共享联合网络1A标准;P = 0.068)。与LVAD受者相比,OHT受者的住院时间更短,1年生存率更高。尽管许多中心不向65岁及以上的患者提供晚期HF治疗,但我们的结果表明,仅年龄本身不应成为晚期HF治疗的障碍,尤其是OHT。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Deaths: Final Data for 2015.死亡:2015年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017 Nov;66(6):1-75.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验