Suppr超能文献

临床前研究方案:内毒素血症性休克中的输血

Pre-clinical study protocol: Blood transfusion in endotoxaemic shock.

作者信息

Obonyo Nchafatso G, Byrne Liam, Tung John-Paul, Simonova Gabriela, Diab Sara D, Dunster Kimble R, Passmore Margaret R, Boon Ai-Ching, See Hoe Louise, Engkilde-Pedersen Sanne, Esguerra-Lallen Arlanna, Fauzi Mohd H, Pimenta Leticia P, Millar Jonathan E, Fanning Jonathon P, Van Haren Frank, Anstey Chris M, Cullen Louise, Suen Jacky, Shekar Kiran, Maitland Kathryn, Fraser John F

机构信息

Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

IDeAL/KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.

出版信息

MethodsX. 2019 May 9;6:1124-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.05.005. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SCC) and the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) guidelines recommend blood transfusion in sepsis when the haemoglobin concentration drops below 7.0 g/dL and 10.0 g/dL respectively, while the World Health Organisation (WHO) guideline recommends transfusion in septic shock 'if intravenous (IV) fluids do not maintain adequate circulation', as a supportive measure of last resort. Volume expansion using crystalloid and colloid fluid boluses for haemodynamic resuscitation in severe illness/sepsis, has been associated with adverse outcomes in recent literature. However, the volume expansion effect(s) following blood transfusion for haemodynamic circulatory support, in severe illness remain unclear with most previous studies having focused on evaluating effects of either different RBC storage durations (short versus long duration) or haemoglobin thresholds (low versus high threshold) pre-transfusion. •We describe the protocol for a pre-clinical randomised controlled trial designed to examine haemodynamic effect(s) of early volume expansion using packed RBCs (PRBCs) transfusion (before any crystalloids or colloids) in a validated ovine-model of hyperdynamic endotoxaemic shock.•Additional exploration of mechanisms underlying any physiological, haemodynamic, haematological, immunologic and tissue specific-effects of blood transfusion will be undertaken including comparison of effects of short (≤5 days) versus long (≥30 days) storage duration of PRBCs prior to transfusion.

摘要

拯救脓毒症运动(SCC)和美国危重病医学会(ACCM)的指南建议,在脓毒症患者血红蛋白浓度分别降至7.0 g/dL和10.0 g/dL以下时进行输血,而世界卫生组织(WHO)的指南建议在脓毒性休克中“如果静脉输液不能维持足够的循环”时进行输血,作为最后的支持措施。在近期文献中,使用晶体液和胶体液大剂量扩容用于重症疾病/脓毒症的血流动力学复苏与不良结局相关。然而,在重症疾病中,输血用于血流动力学循环支持后的扩容效果仍不清楚,以前的大多数研究都集中在评估不同红细胞储存时间(短期与长期)或输血前血红蛋白阈值(低阈值与高阈值)的影响上。•我们描述了一项临床前随机对照试验的方案,该试验旨在研究在经过验证的高动力性内毒素血症休克绵羊模型中,早期使用浓缩红细胞(PRBC)输血(在使用任何晶体液或胶体液之前)进行容量扩张的血流动力学效应。•将进一步探索输血的任何生理、血流动力学、血液学、免疫学和组织特异性效应的潜在机制,包括比较输血前PRBC短期(≤5天)与长期(≥30天)储存时间的效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c068/6529713/659b8c172727/fx1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验