Department of Burn Surgery, Changhai Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Trauma Research Center, Fourth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e030854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030854.
We employed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess benefits and risks of a threshold of haemoglobin level below 7 g/dL versus liberal transfusion strategy among critically ill patients, and even patients with septic shock.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
We performed systematical searches for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and PubMed databases up to 1 September 2019.
RCTs among adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients comparing 7 g/dL as restrictive strategy with liberal transfusion were incorporated.
The clinical outcomes, including short-term mortality, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic events, were screened and analysed after data collection. We applied odds ratios (ORs) to analyse dichotomous outcomes and standardised mean differences (SMDs) to analyse continuous outcomes with fixed or random effects models based on heterogeneity evaluation for each outcome.
Eight RCTs with 3415 patients were included. Compared with a more liberal threshold, a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion threshold <7 g/dL haemoglobin showed no significant difference in short-term mortality (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.21, p=0.48, I=53%), length of hospital stay (SMD: -0.11, 95% CI: -0.30 to 0.07, p=0.24, I=71%), length of ICU stay (SMD: -0.03, 95% CI: -0.14 to 0.08, p=0.54, I=0%) or ischaemic events (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.48, p=0.48, I=51%). However, we found that the incidence of MI (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.98, p=0.04, I=0%) was lower in the group with the threshold <7 g/dL than that with the more liberal threshold.
An RBC transfusion threshold <7 g/dL haemoglobin is incapable of decreasing short-term mortality in ICU patients according to currently published evidences, while it might have potential role in reducing MI incidence.
我们采用全面的系统评价和荟萃分析来评估临界血红蛋白水平低于 7g/dL 与宽松输血策略相比在危重症患者中的获益和风险,甚至在感染性休克患者中也是如此。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们在 Cochrane 图书馆、EMBASE 和 PubMed 数据库中进行了系统搜索,检索时间截至 2019 年 9 月 1 日。
纳入比较成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者中 7g/dL 作为限制性策略与宽松输血的随机对照试验(RCT)。
收集数据后筛选并分析包括短期死亡率、住院时间、ICU 住院时间、心肌梗死(MI)和缺血事件在内的临床结局。我们应用比值比(OR)分析二分类结局,应用标准化均数差(SMD)分析连续性结局,根据每个结局的异质性评估,采用固定或随机效应模型。
纳入了 8 项 RCT 共 3415 例患者。与更宽松的阈值相比,血红蛋白 <7g/dL 的红细胞(RBC)输血阈值并未显示短期死亡率(OR:0.90,95%CI:0.67 至 1.21,p=0.48,I=53%)、住院时间(SMD:-0.11,95%CI:-0.30 至 0.07,p=0.24,I=71%)、ICU 住院时间(SMD:-0.03,95%CI:-0.14 至 0.08,p=0.54,I=0%)或缺血事件(OR:0.80,95%CI:0.43 至 1.48,p=0.48,I=51%)存在显著差异。然而,我们发现阈值 <7g/dL 组的 MI 发生率(OR:0.54,95%CI:0.30 至 0.98,p=0.04,I=0%)低于更宽松阈值组。
根据目前发表的证据,血红蛋白水平 <7g/dL 的 RBC 输血阈值不能降低 ICU 患者的短期死亡率,而可能降低 MI 发生率。