Hurley Laura P, Beaty Brenda, Lockhart Steven, Gurfinkel Dennis, Dickinson L Miriam, Roth Heather, Kempe Allison
Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Childrens Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, CO, United States of America.
Prev Med Rep. 2019 May 22;15:100893. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100893. eCollection 2019 Sep.
Our objectives were to assess 1) effectiveness of using Colorado's Immunization Information System (CIIS) to send out vaccine reminder/recalls (R/Rs) centrally vs. usual care for adult vaccine delivery within an accountable care organization (ACO) and 2) practice staff's perception of centralized R/R. From 9/2016 to 4/2017, we conducted a randomized controlled trial among adults enrolled in a Medicaid ACO at six healthcare entities. Adults were divided into two strata: 15,153 age 19-64 and 616 age 65+. Adults age 19-64 who needed influenza and/or Tdap vaccine, and adults age 65+ who needed influenza, and/or Tdap, and/or a pneumococcal vaccine were randomized to receive up to 3 R/Rs by autodialed telephone and mail or usual care. Documentation of receipt of any needed vaccines in CIIS within six months was the primary outcome. We assessed intervention effectiveness using mixed effect logistic regression. Thirteen semi-structured exit interviews were conducted with staff from each healthcare entity. The intervention was not associated with the primary outcome for the age 19-64 population [OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.98-1.15)] or age 65+ population [(OR 0.96 (0.69-1.32)]. Practice staff perceived the intervention to be beneficial and not burdensome. Perceived barriers included lack of availability of appointments and adults receiving only influenza vaccine when other vaccines were needed. In conclusion, centralized R/R was not effective at improving adult vaccination rates in a Medicaid ACO. Future studies should consider better harmonizing vaccine centralized R/Rs with vaccine delivery efforts within the practice setting. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02133391.
1)在 accountable care organization(ACO)中,使用科罗拉多州免疫信息系统(CIIS)集中发送疫苗提醒/召回通知(R/Rs)与成人疫苗接种常规护理相比的有效性;2)医疗机构工作人员对集中式 R/R 的看法。2016 年 9 月至 2017 年 4 月,我们在六个医疗保健机构中对参加医疗补助 ACO 的成年人进行了一项随机对照试验。成年人分为两个年龄段:15153 名年龄在 19 - 64 岁之间,616 名年龄在 65 岁及以上。需要流感和/或破伤风类毒素疫苗(Tdap)的 19 - 64 岁成年人,以及需要流感、和/或 Tdap、和/或肺炎球菌疫苗的 65 岁及以上成年人被随机分配,通过自动拨号电话和邮件接收最多 3 次 R/Rs 或接受常规护理。六个月内在 CIIS 中记录任何所需疫苗的接种情况是主要结果。我们使用混合效应逻辑回归评估干预效果。对每个医疗保健机构的工作人员进行了 13 次半结构化离职访谈。该干预与 19 - 64 岁人群的主要结果无关[比值比(OR)为 1.06(95%置信区间 0.98 - 1.15)],也与 65 岁及以上人群的主要结果无关[OR 为 0.96(0.69 - 1.32)]。医疗机构工作人员认为该干预有益且不繁重。感知到的障碍包括预约难以及成年人在需要其他疫苗时仅接种流感疫苗。总之,在医疗补助 ACO 中,集中式 R/R 在提高成人疫苗接种率方面无效。未来的研究应考虑在医疗机构环境中更好地协调疫苗集中式 R/Rs 与疫苗接种工作。临床试验注册号:NCT02133391。