School of Physical Education and Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Sep;8(9):1689-1705. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01940-6. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
Although immunization can dramatically curb the mortality and morbidity associated with vaccine-preventable diseases, vaccination uptake remains suboptimal in many areas of the world. Here, in this meta-analysis, we analysed the results from 88 eligible randomized controlled trials testing interventions to increase vaccination uptake with 1,628,768 participants from 17 countries with variable development levels (for example, Human Development Index ranging from 0.485 to 0.955). We estimated the efficacy of seven intervention strategies including increasing access to vaccination, sending vaccination reminders, providing incentives, supplying information, correcting misinformation, promoting both active and passive motivation and teaching behavioural skills. We showed that the odds of vaccination were 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 1.77) times higher for intervention than control conditions. Among the intervention strategies, using incentives and increasing access were most promising in improving vaccination uptake, with the access strategy being particularly effective in countries with lower incomes and less access to healthcare.
尽管免疫接种可以显著降低疫苗可预防疾病相关的死亡率和发病率,但在世界许多地区,疫苗接种率仍不理想。在这里,我们通过对来自 17 个发展水平不同的国家(例如,人类发展指数从 0.485 到 0.955)的 88 项具有合格随机对照试验结果的分析,评估了 7 种干预措施增加疫苗接种率的效果,这些试验共纳入了 1628768 名参与者。我们评估了 7 种干预策略的效果,包括增加疫苗接种服务的可及性、发送疫苗接种提醒、提供激励措施、提供信息、纠正错误信息、促进主动和被动激励以及教授行为技能。结果显示,与对照组相比,干预组的疫苗接种率增加了 1.5 倍(95%置信区间,1.27 至 1.77)。在干预策略中,使用激励措施和增加疫苗接种服务的可及性最有希望提高疫苗接种率,而在收入较低、医疗服务获取机会较少的国家,增加疫苗接种服务的可及性策略尤其有效。