Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena, CA (J.A.L.).
Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun;12(6):e007702. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007702. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
Background While randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease, the long-term durability of DCB angioplasty remains uncertain. Methods and Results IN.PACT SFA is a prospective, multicenter, randomized single-blinded trial (Randomized Trial of IN.PACT Admiral Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty [PTA] Balloon Catheter vs Standard PTA for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery [SFA] and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery [PPA]) that enrolled 331 subjects with symptomatic (Rutherford 2-4) femoropopliteal lesions. Subjects were randomly assigned 2:1 to the IN.PACT Admiral DCB or PTA. Assessments through 5 years included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, the primary safety end point, and major adverse events. Through 5 years, patients treated with the IN.PACT Admiral DCB demonstrated a sustained treatment effect with superior freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization when compared with PTA (Kaplan-Meier estimate of 74.5% versus 65.3%; log-rank P=0.020). The primary safety composite was achieved in 70.7% of subjects in the DCB and 59.6% in the PTA groups ( P=0.068). The major adverse event rate was 42.9% for DCB and 48.1% for PTA ( P=0.459). There were no device- or procedure-related deaths in either group as adjudicated by an independent and blinded Clinical Events Committee. Conclusions The IN.PACT SFA randomized trial demonstrates that the IN.PACT Admiral DCB continues to perform better than PTA through 5 years with higher freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization. The sustained safety and effectiveness profile of this DCB supports its use as a preferred treatment choice compared with PTA for femoropopliteal lesions. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01175850 (IN.PACT SFA phase I) and NCT01566461 (IN.PACT SFA phase II).
背景 虽然随机试验已经证明,药物涂层球囊(DCB)血管成形术在股腘动脉周围疾病患者中优于标准经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA),但 DCB 血管成形术的长期耐久性仍不确定。
方法和结果 IN.PACT SFA 是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、单盲试验(IN.PACT 海军上将紫杉醇涂层经皮腔内血管成形术 [PTA] 球囊导管与标准 PTA 治疗股浅动脉 [SFA] 和/或近段腘动脉 [PPA] 动脉粥样硬化病变的随机试验),共纳入 331 例有症状(Rutherford 2-4 级)股腘动脉病变的患者。患者以 2:1 的比例随机分配至 IN.PACT 海军上将 DCB 或 PTA 组。通过 5 年评估包括免于临床驱动的靶病变血运重建的无事件率,这是主要的安全性终点,以及主要不良事件。通过 5 年,与 PTA 相比,接受 IN.PACT 海军上将 DCB 治疗的患者表现出持续的治疗效果,无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建的无事件率更高(Kaplan-Meier 估计值分别为 74.5%和 65.3%;对数秩 P=0.020)。DCB 组 70.7%的患者和 PTA 组 59.6%的患者达到了主要安全性复合终点(P=0.068)。DCB 组主要不良事件发生率为 42.9%,PTA 组为 48.1%(P=0.459)。在由独立和盲法临床事件委员会裁定的两组中,均无设备或手术相关死亡。
结论 IN.PACT SFA 随机试验表明,通过 5 年的随访,IN.PACT 海军上将 DCB 的无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建率继续优于 PTA。这种 DCB 的持续安全性和有效性特征支持其与 PTA 相比作为股腘动脉病变的首选治疗选择。
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov 。唯一标识符:NCT01175850(IN.PACT SFA Ⅰ期)和 NCT01566461(IN.PACT SFA Ⅱ期)。