• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紫杉醇暴露与死亡率不相关:药物涂层球囊的独立患者水平荟萃分析。

Mortality Not Correlated With Paclitaxel Exposure: An Independent Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of a Drug-Coated Balloon.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, California.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2550-2563. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.013
PMID:30690141
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Five years of prospective clinical trials confirm that the paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) (IN.PACT Admiral, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) is safe and effective to treat femoropopliteal artery disease. A recent meta-analysis of heterogeneous trials of paclitaxel-based balloons and stents reported that they are associated with increased mortality and that higher doses are linked to higher mortality from 2 to 5 years.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a correlation between paclitaxel exposure and mortality by conducting an independent patient-level meta-analysis of 1,980 patients with up to 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

Data from 2 single-arm and 2 randomized independently adjudicated prospective studies of a paclitaxel DCB (n = 1,837) and uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (n = 143) were included. Analyses of baseline, procedure, and follow-up data of individual patients were performed to explore correlations of paclitaxel dose with long-term mortality. Survival time by paclitaxel dose tercile was analyzed with adjustment of inverse probability weighting to correct baseline imbalances and study as random effect. A standard cohort was defined to compare DCB- and PTA-treated patients with similar characteristics by applying criteria from pivotal studies (n = 712 DCB, n = 143 PTA).

RESULTS

A survival analysis stratified nominal paclitaxel dose by low, mid, and upper terciles; mean doses were 5,019.0, 10,007.5, and 19,978.2 μg, respectively. Rates of freedom from all-cause mortality between the 3 groups through 5 years were 85.8%, 84.2%, and 88.2%, respectively (p = 0.731). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between DCB and PTA through 5 years comparing all patients (unadjusted p = 0.092) or patients with similar characteristics (adjusted p = 0.188).

CONCLUSIONS

This independent patient-level meta-analysis demonstrates that this paclitaxel DCB is safe. Within DCB patients, there was no correlation between level of paclitaxel exposure and mortality. (Randomized Trial of IN.PACT Admiral® Drug Coated Balloon vs Standard PTA for the Treatment of SFA and Proximal Popliteal Arterial Disease [INPACT SFA I], NCT01175850; IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery [SFA] and Proximal Popliteal Artery [PPA] [INPACT SFA II], NCT01566461; MDT-2113 Drug-Eluting Balloon vs. Standard PTA for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery [MDT-2113 SFA], NCT01947478; The IN.PACT SFA Clinical Study for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery Using the IN.PACT Admiral™ Drug-Eluting Balloon in a Chinese Patient Population, NCT02118532; and IN.PACT Global Clinical Study, NCT01609296).

摘要

背景

五年的前瞻性临床试验证实,紫杉醇药物涂层球囊(DCB)(IN.PACT Admiral,美敦力,都柏林,爱尔兰)在治疗股腘动脉疾病方面是安全有效的。最近一项关于紫杉醇球囊和支架的异质性试验的荟萃分析报告称,它们与死亡率增加有关,而且较高的剂量与 2 至 5 年的死亡率增加有关。

目的

本研究旨在通过对 1980 例接受长达 5 年随访的患者进行独立的患者水平荟萃分析,确定紫杉醇暴露与死亡率之间是否存在相关性。

方法

纳入了 2 项单臂和 2 项随机独立裁决的前瞻性紫杉醇 DCB 研究(n=1837)和未涂层经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)(n=143)的数据。对单个患者的基线、手术和随访数据进行分析,以探讨紫杉醇剂量与长期死亡率的相关性。通过调整逆概率加权来校正基线不平衡和研究作为随机效应,对紫杉醇剂量三分位数的生存时间进行分析。使用关键研究的标准(n=712 DCB,n=143 PTA)定义标准队列,以比较具有相似特征的 DCB 和 PTA 治疗患者。

结果

对名义紫杉醇剂量进行分层,分为低、中、高三分位数;平均剂量分别为 5019.0、10007.5 和 19978.2μg。三组患者在 5 年内的全因死亡率分别为 85.8%、84.2%和 88.2%(p=0.731)。在所有患者(未调整 p=0.092)或具有相似特征的患者(调整后 p=0.188)中,5 年内 DCB 和 PTA 的全因死亡率无显著差异。

结论

这项独立的患者水平荟萃分析表明,这种紫杉醇 DCB 是安全的。在 DCB 患者中,紫杉醇暴露水平与死亡率之间没有相关性。(IN.PACT Admiral®药物涂层球囊治疗股浅动脉和/或腘动脉疾病的随机试验[INPACT SFA I],NCT01175850;IN.PACT 紫杉醇药物涂层球囊与标准球囊血管成形术治疗股浅动脉和/或腘动脉疾病[INPACT SFA II],NCT01566461;MDT-2113 药物洗脱球囊与标准 PTA 治疗股浅动脉和/或腘动脉动脉粥样硬化病变[MDT-2113 SFA],NCT01947478;在中国患者人群中使用 IN.PACT Admiral™药物洗脱球囊治疗股浅动脉和/或腘动脉动脉粥样硬化病变的 IN.PACT SFA 临床研究,NCT02118532;以及 IN.PACT 全球临床研究,NCT01609296)。

相似文献

1
Mortality Not Correlated With Paclitaxel Exposure: An Independent Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of a Drug-Coated Balloon.紫杉醇暴露与死亡率不相关:药物涂层球囊的独立患者水平荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2550-2563. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
2
Long-Term Clinical Effectiveness of a Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions.药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉病变的长期临床疗效。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun;12(6):e007702. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007702. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Determinants of Drug-Coated Balloon Failure in Patients Undergoing Femoropopliteal Arterial Intervention.股腘动脉介入治疗患者中药物涂层球囊失败的决定因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1241-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.043.
4
Drug-Coated Balloon vs Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: One-Year Results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan Randomized Trial.药物涂层球囊与标准经皮腔内血管成形术治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉近段粥样硬化病变:MDT-2113 SFA 日本随机试验一年结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Feb;25(1):109-117. doi: 10.1177/1526602817745565. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Durability of Treatment Effect Using a Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 24-Month Results of IN.PACT SFA.药物涂层球囊治疗股浅动脉病变的疗效持久性:IN.PACT SFA 的 24 个月结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2329-2338. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.063. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
6
Treatment Effect of Drug-Coated Balloons Is Durable to 3 Years in the Femoropopliteal Arteries: Long-Term Results of the IN.PACT SFA Randomized Trial.药物涂层球囊在股浅动脉中 3 年的疗效持久:IN.PACT SFA 随机试验的长期结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005891. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005891.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Femoropopliteal Intervention Using Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty: Results From the IN.PACT SFA II Trial.药物涂层球囊血管内治疗股浅动脉病变与传统经皮腔内血管成形术的成本效果比较:来自 IN.PACT SFA II 试验的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 28;9(22):2343-2352. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.036.
8
Drug-coated balloon versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery: 2-year results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan randomized trial.药物涂层球囊与非涂层经皮腔内血管成形术治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉近段动脉粥样硬化病变:MDT-2113 SFA Japan 随机试验 2 年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 1;93(4):664-672. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28048. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术治疗股腘外周动脉疾病的安全性。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec 23;12(24):2515-2524. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
10
The IN.PACT DEEP Clinical Drug-Coated Balloon Trial: 5-Year Outcomes.《IN.PACT DEEP 临床药物涂层球囊试验:5 年结果》
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 24;13(4):431-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.10.059.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Femoropopliteal Drug-Coated Balloon Use on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.股腘动脉药物涂层球囊的使用对慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者临床结局的影响
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Sep;106(3):1993-2004. doi: 10.1002/ccd.70033. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Safety and Efficacy of a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Symptomatic Patients with Long Superficial Femoral Artery Disease.紫杉醇涂层球囊治疗有症状的股浅动脉长段病变患者的安全性和有效性
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2025 Apr 10;21:239-250. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S510121. eCollection 2025.
3
Femoropopliteal Interventions for Peripheral Artery Disease: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions.
股腘动脉介入治疗周围动脉疾病:当前证据与未来方向综述
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2025 Apr;14(2):243-256. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2024.11.010. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
4
Efficacy of drug-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon for dysfunctional dialysis access: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药物涂层球囊与未涂层球囊治疗功能不良透析通路的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2025 Feb 24. doi: 10.1007/s10157-025-02642-7.
5
Jetstream Atherectomy with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons: 3-Year Outcomes of the Prospective Randomized JET-RANGER Study.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管内斑块旋切术:前瞻性随机JET-RANGER研究的3年结果
Int J Angiol. 2024 Oct 3;34(1):56-59. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791546. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Drug-eluting devices for lower limb peripheral arterial disease.药物洗脱装置治疗下肢外周动脉疾病。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Sep 16;20(18):e1136-e1153. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01080.
7
Surgical and Endovascular Therapies for Below-the-Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Contemporary Review.膝下外周动脉疾病的手术及血管内治疗:当代综述
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Jan 29;3(3Part A):101268. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101268. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Five-Year Independent Patient-Level Mortality Analysis of the Pooled ILLUMENATE Pivotal and EU Randomized Controlled Trials.ILLUMENATE关键试验与欧盟随机对照试验合并数据的五年独立患者水平死亡率分析
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Jul 12;2(4):100634. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100634. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
9
Coronary Drug-Coated Balloons for De Novo and In-Stent Restenosis Indications.用于初发和支架内再狭窄适应症的冠状动脉药物涂层球囊。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Mar 30;2(3):100625. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100625. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
10
Paclitaxel-Coated versus Uncoated Balloon for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.紫杉醇涂层球囊与未涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉支架内再狭窄:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 14;23(9):315. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2309315. eCollection 2022 Sep.