Suppr超能文献

现行妊娠糖尿病管理指南:内容分析与评价。

Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal.

机构信息

Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite many guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes available internationally, little work has been done to summarize and assess the content of existing guidelines. A paucity of analysis guidelines within in a unified system may be one explanatory factor. So this study aims to analyze and evaluate the contents of all available guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes.

METHOD

Relevant clinical guidelines were collected through a search of relevant guideline websites and databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, etc.). Fourteen guidelines were identified, and each guideline was assessed for quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Two independent reviewers extracted guideline recommendations using a "recommendation matrix" through which basic guideline information and consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fourteen documents were analyzed, and a total of 361 original recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management were assessed. In all guidelines included, the recommendations were developed in five domains, namely, diagnosis of GDM, prenatal care, intrapartum care, neonatal care and postpartum care. Different guidelines appeared to have significant discrepancy in consistency of guideline content, but overall, there was consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations (scilicet 49.31, 57.20 and 58.17%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although commonality in most recommendations existed, there were still some discrepancies between guidelines. Consistency of guidelines on the management of GDM in pregnancy is highly variable and needs to be improved.

摘要

背景

尽管国际上有许多关于妊娠糖尿病管理的指南,但很少有人致力于总结和评估现有指南的内容。缺乏统一系统内的分析指南可能是一个解释因素。因此,本研究旨在分析和评估所有关于妊娠糖尿病管理的现有指南的内容。

方法

通过搜索相关指南网站和数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 等)收集相关临床指南。确定了 14 条指南,并使用评估指南研究与评估(AGREE II)工具对每条指南进行质量评估。两位独立的评审员使用“推荐矩阵”提取指南建议,通过该矩阵分析基本指南信息以及搜索策略与证据选择、证据选择与解释、解释与推荐结果之间的一致性。

结果

分析了 14 份文件,共评估了 361 项关于妊娠糖尿病管理的原始建议。在所有纳入的指南中,建议在五个领域制定,即 GDM 的诊断、产前护理、分娩期护理、新生儿护理和产后护理。不同的指南在指南内容的一致性方面似乎存在显著差异,但总体而言,搜索策略与证据选择、证据选择与解释以及解释与推荐结果之间存在一致性(分别为 49.31%、57.20%和 58.17%)。

结论

尽管大多数建议存在共性,但指南之间仍存在一些差异。妊娠糖尿病管理指南的一致性差异很大,需要改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验