Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence and University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 16;159(2):123-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00661.
Outcomes of treating gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are not well-established.
To summarize evidence about the maternal and neonatal benefits and harms of treating GDM.
15 electronic databases from 1995 to May 2012, gray literature, Web sites of relevant organizations, trial registries, and reference lists.
English-language randomized, controlled trials (n = 5) and cohort studies (n = 6) of women without known preexisting diabetes.
One reviewer extracted data, and a second reviewer verified them. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and evaluated strength of evidence for primary outcomes by using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
All studies compared diet modification, glucose monitoring, and insulin as needed with no treatment. Women who were treated had more prenatal visits than those in control groups. Moderate evidence showed fewer cases of preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, and macrosomia in the treated group. Evidence was insufficient for maternal weight gain and birth injury. Low evidence showed no difference between groups for neonatal hypoglycemia. Evidence was insufficient for long-term metabolic outcomes among offspring. No difference was found for cesarean delivery (low evidence), induction of labor (insufficient evidence), small-for-gestational-age neonates (moderate evidence), or admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (low evidence).
Evidence is low or insufficient for many outcomes of greatest clinical importance. The strongest evidence supports reductions in intermediate outcomes; however, other factors (for example, maternal weight and gestational weight gain) may impart greater risk than GDM, particularly when glucose levels are modestly elevated.
Treating GDM results in less preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, and macrosomia; however, current evidence does not show an effect on neonatal hypoglycemia or future poor metabolic outcomes. There is little evidence of short-term harm of treating GDM other than an increased demand for services.
治疗妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的结果尚不确定。
总结治疗 GDM 的母婴获益和危害的证据。
1995 年至 2012 年 5 月的 15 个电子数据库、灰色文献、相关组织的网站、试验注册处和参考文献列表。
针对无已知先前存在糖尿病的女性的英语随机对照试验(n=5)和队列研究(n=6)。
一位审查员提取数据,第二位审查员验证数据。两位审查员独立评估了方法学质量,并使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach)对主要结局的证据强度进行了评估。
所有研究均比较了饮食调整、血糖监测和按需胰岛素治疗与不治疗。与对照组相比,接受治疗的女性产前就诊次数更多。中等质量证据表明治疗组子痫前期、肩难产和巨大儿的病例更少。对于母亲体重增加和分娩损伤,证据不足。低血糖的证据表明两组之间没有差异。对于后代的长期代谢结局,证据不足。剖宫产(低质量证据)、引产(证据不足)、小于胎龄儿(中等质量证据)或新生儿重症监护病房(低质量证据)的发生率无差异。
许多最重要的临床结局的证据均为低质量或证据不足。最强的证据支持中间结局的减少;然而,其他因素(例如,母亲体重和妊娠期体重增加)可能比 GDM 带来更大的风险,尤其是当血糖水平适度升高时。
治疗 GDM 可减少子痫前期、肩难产和巨大儿;然而,目前的证据并未显示对新生儿低血糖或未来不良代谢结局有影响。除了对服务需求的增加外,治疗 GDM 几乎没有短期危害的证据。