El-Emam El-Sayed M, El Motlb Enas A Abd
Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):269-273. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_42_19.
Some pediatric supraglottic airway devices have not been evaluated in a large perspective for blind intubation although they are validated as a conduit for fiberoptic-guided intubation.
The objective of this study was to compare the success rate of blind technique with correction maneuvers versus fiberoptic-guided intubation through the air-Q laryngeal airway in pediatric patients.
One hundred and twenty-six pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into two equal groups. The air-Q was placed in all patients as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Group B patients underwent blind intubation with correction maneuvers. Group F patients underwent fiberoptic-guided intubation.
There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the success rate of intubation or postextubation complications. Group F patients showed a significantly longer time to intubation and total time of the trial. Furthermore, Group F patients showed a significantly higher level of pre- and postintubation heart rate compared to Group B patients.
Blind tracheal intubation in pediatric patients through the air-Q with correction maneuvers could be a good alternative for fiberoptic-guided intubation with stable hemodynamics and shorter time till intubation.
一些儿科声门上气道装置虽经证实可作为纤维支气管镜引导插管的通道,但尚未从大样本角度对其盲插情况进行评估。
本研究旨在比较小儿患者经Air-Q喉罩气道采用带纠正手法的盲插技术与纤维支气管镜引导插管的成功率。
126例接受全身麻醉下择期手术的小儿患者被随机分为两组,每组人数相等。所有患者均置入Air-Q作为气管插管通道。B组患者采用带纠正手法的盲插技术,F组患者采用纤维支气管镜引导插管。
两组在插管成功率或拔管后并发症方面无显著差异。F组患者插管时间和整个试验总时间显著更长。此外,与B组患者相比,F组患者插管前后心率显著更高。
小儿患者经Air-Q采用带纠正手法的盲插气管技术,对于纤维支气管镜引导插管而言,可能是一种较好的替代方法,可保持血流动力学稳定且插管时间更短。