Suppr超能文献

评价不同龋病治疗方法制备的Ⅴ类洞的微渗漏。

Evaluation of microleakage in class v cavities prepared by different caries removal methods.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey.

出版信息

Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Sep;82(9):1566-1574. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23322. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate the effects of different caries removal methods on microleakage success of class V adhesive restorations by means of light microscopy (stereomicroscope) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations. Sixty-four human teeth with class V caries that measured with DIAGNOdent were used. The samples were divided into four groups (n = 16) randomly according to caries removing methods of conventional method, Carisolv, Papacarie, and Er,Cr:YSGG laser system. The self-etch Clearfıl SE Bond and Clearfıl Majesty Es-II were used as restoration materials. After thermal cycles of 2,000 (5 and 55°C) samples were immersed in a 50% wt/wt AgNO Samples were finally imaged and scored under light microscopy and SEM, respectively. The data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis H, pairwise comparison and Wilcoxon's T tests at 5% significance level (p < .05). Statistical analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference between microleakage scores in dentin regions but there were significant difference between the Papacarie and Er,Cr:YSGGlaser in terms of leakage scores in enamel sites. No statistically significant difference in leakage scores emerged between light microscopy and SEM.

摘要

本研究旨在通过立体显微镜和扫描电子显微镜观察,比较不同龋坏去除方法对 V 类洞型复合树脂修复体微渗漏效果的影响。选择 64 颗 DIAGNOdent 测量有 V 类龋坏的人磨牙,随机分为四组(每组 16 颗),根据常规方法、Carisolv、Papacarie 和 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光系统的龋坏去除方法进行分组。使用自酸蚀 Clearfıl SE Bond 和 Clearfıl Majesty Es-II 作为修复材料。在热循环 2000 次(5 次和 55°C)后,将样本浸泡在 50% wt/wt AgNO 中。最后,分别在立体显微镜和扫描电子显微镜下对样本进行成像和评分。使用 Kruskal-Wallis H、两两比较和 Wilcoxon T 检验在 5%的显著性水平(p <.05)进行统计分析。统计分析表明,牙本质区域的微渗漏评分无显著差异,但在牙釉质区域,Papacarie 和 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光之间的渗漏评分存在显著差异。在微渗漏评分方面,立体显微镜和扫描电子显微镜之间没有统计学差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验