• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养老院的监管:比较视角

The regulation of nursing homes: a comparative perspective.

作者信息

Day P, Klein R

机构信息

Centre for the Analysis of Social Policy, University of Bath.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1987;65(3):303-47.

PMID:3119973
Abstract

Britain and the United States alike face the question of how best to protect the growing and vulnerable population of nursing home residents through State regulation of private institutions. Despite marked differences in scale, organization, and financing between the two nations, there are striking similarities in the problems encountered and in styles of enforcement adopted in response. Analysis of the regulatory systems in practice shows a convergence in the regulatory process despite the dissimilarities between formal regulatory models. Both systems are responding--however imperfectly--to the social environment of nursing home care. Future regulatory policy will have to encompass formal and informal, legal and social control.

摘要

英国和美国都面临着这样一个问题

如何通过国家对私立机构的监管,以最佳方式保护日益增多且易受伤害的养老院居民群体。尽管两国在规模、机构设置和资金筹集方面存在显著差异,但在遇到的问题以及相应采取的执法方式上却有惊人的相似之处。对实际监管体系的分析表明,尽管正式监管模式不同,但监管过程却趋于一致。这两种体系都在——无论多么不完善地——应对养老院护理的社会环境。未来的监管政策将不得不涵盖正式和非正式、法律和社会控制。

相似文献

1
The regulation of nursing homes: a comparative perspective.养老院的监管:比较视角
Milbank Q. 1987;65(3):303-47.
2
Quality of life in long-term institutions: is a regulatory strategy feasible?长期机构中的生活质量:监管策略是否可行?
Dan Med Bull. 1987 Oct;Suppl 5:73-81.
3
The impact of laws and regulations in improving physician performance and care processes in long-term care.法律法规对改善长期护理中医生表现及护理流程的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004 Jul-Aug;5(4):268-77. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000129817.84534.68.
4
Nursing home culture change: legal apprehensions and opportunities.养老院文化变革:法律顾虑与机遇。
Gerontologist. 2013 Oct;53(5):718-26. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns131. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
5
Review of nursing home regulations.养老院法规综述。
Medsurg Nurs. 1998 Jun;7(3):165-71.
6
New legal framework in residential care.住宿护理方面的新法律框架。
Elder Care. 1997 Apr-May;9(2):8-9. doi: 10.7748/eldc.9.2.8.s13.
7
Punitive damages in lawsuits against nursing homes.针对疗养院的诉讼中的惩罚性损害赔偿。
J Leg Med. 2002 Mar;23(1):115-29. doi: 10.1080/019476402317276696.
8
HHS sued over preadmission screening.美国卫生与公众服务部因入院前筛查被起诉。
Geriatr Nurs. 1989 Jul-Aug;10(4):174.
9
HHS launches national nursing home QI.美国卫生与公众服务部启动全国养老院质量改进计划。
Hosp Peer Rev. 2003 Jan;28(1):13-5.
10
Informing consumers through simplified nursing home evaluations.通过简化的养老院评估向消费者提供信息。
J Leg Med. 2009 Oct-Dec;30(4):545-62. doi: 10.1080/01947640903356332.

引用本文的文献

1
Supervision of care networks for frail community dwelling adults aged 75 years and older: protocol of a mixed methods study.对75岁及以上体弱社区居住成年人护理网络的监督:一项混合方法研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 25;5(8):e008632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008632.
2
Experimental studies to improve the reliability and validity of regulatory judgments on health care in the Netherlands: a randomized controlled trial and before and after case study.提高荷兰医疗保健监管判断的可靠性和有效性的实验研究:一项随机对照试验及前后案例研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Aug;20(4):352-61. doi: 10.1111/jep.12136. Epub 2014 May 12.
3
State "technical assistance programs" for nursing home quality improvement: variations and potential implications.
养老院质量改进的“技术援助计划”:差异及潜在影响。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2012;24(4):349-67. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2012.735157.
4
The rise of regulation in the NHS.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中监管力度的增强。
BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):967-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.967.
5
Regulating nursing homes: Caring for older people in the private sector in England.监管养老院:照顾英格兰私立部门中的老年人。
BMJ. 2001 Sep 8;323(7312):566-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.566.