Rutgers University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2019 Oct 1;44(5):789-806. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7611659.
The Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) program, an increasingly utilized payment strategy to foster population health management by hospitals and outpatient providers, may sometimes generate financial and operational hardships for safety net hospitals (SNHs). The authors utilized a hospital survey and stakeholder interviews to examine impacts of the New Jersey DSRIP program, particularly focusing on its participatory structure that extended eligibility to all hospitals, and specific effects on SNHs. They found that the New Jersey DSRIP fulfilled its primary objective of conditioning receipt of Medicaid supplementary payments on quality and reporting of care by hospitals. It also provided an impetus to ongoing hospital-directed initiatives and introduced new areas of focus, including behavioral health and obesity. However, stakeholders reported that program implementation was not sensitive to specific constraints, priorities, and resource needs of SNHs. Some of the policies relating to outpatient partnerships, reporting of quality metrics, and monitoring low-income populations were perceived to have placed disproportionate burdens on SNHs. Despite appearing to meet its primary goals, the New Jersey DSRIP experience reveals a critical need to be responsive to problems faced by SNHs so as to limit their short-term transition costs and maintain financial viability for serving their patient populations.
支付激励计划(DSRIP)是一种日益被广泛采用的支付策略,旨在通过医院和门诊提供者来促进人群健康管理。但该计划有时可能会给医疗服务提供方带来财务和运营方面的困难。作者通过对医院的调查和利益相关者访谈,研究了新泽西州 DSRIP 计划的影响,特别是该计划的参与性结构将资格扩大到所有医院,以及对 SNH 的具体影响。他们发现,新泽西州 DSRIP 实现了其主要目标,即将获得医疗补助补充支付与医院提供的医疗质量和报告挂钩。它还推动了正在进行的医院主导的举措,并引入了新的重点领域,包括行为健康和肥胖症。然而,利益相关者报告称,该计划的实施并没有考虑到 SNH 的具体限制、优先事项和资源需求。一些与门诊合作、质量指标报告和监测低收入人群相关的政策被认为给 SNH 带来了不成比例的负担。尽管新泽西州 DSRIP 似乎达到了其主要目标,但它的经验表明,需要对 SNH 面临的问题做出反应,以限制其短期过渡成本并维持为其患者群体服务的财务可行性。