School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Buk-gu, Gwangju 500-712, Republic of Korea.
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at Stephenville, Texas A&M University, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 15;687:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.428. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
Effects of two different start-up methods were compared during conversion from mesophilic to thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. During the batch operation, a transient increase in both total bacterial concentration and relative abundance of thermophilic bacteria in R1 (a one-step increase method) resulted in 34% higher volatile solids (VS) removal efficiency by R1 compared to R2 (a step-wise increase method). Meanwhile, higher total archaeal concentration and increased relative abundance of thermophilic archaea in R2 were attributed to 65% higher methane production by R2 compared to R1. The same trends for VS removal and methane production were observed during the subsequent continuous mode, although the microbial composition of the two reactors became similar. These findings may prove helpful for determining the preferred start-up method for thermophilic anaerobic digestion: a one-step method can be proposed for higher VS removal efficiency, or a step-wise method can be selected for enhanced methane production.
比较了两种不同的启动方法在从中温厌氧消化到高温厌氧消化污水污泥过程中的效果。在批处理操作中,R1(一步增加法)中总细菌浓度和高温细菌相对丰度的瞬时增加导致 R1 的挥发性固体(VS)去除效率比 R2(逐步增加法)高 34%。同时,R2 中的总古菌浓度较高,高温古菌的相对丰度增加,导致 R2 的甲烷产量比 R1 高 65%。在随后的连续模式下,也观察到了 VS 去除和甲烷生成的相同趋势,尽管两个反应器的微生物组成变得相似。这些发现可能有助于确定高温厌氧消化的首选启动方法:一步法可用于提高 VS 去除效率,或者选择逐步法以提高甲烷产量。