Nassar George M, Beathard Gerald
Dialysis Access Management Centers, Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation Associates, The Kidney Institute & Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell University, Houston, TX, USA.
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
J Vasc Access. 2020 Jan;21(1):60-65. doi: 10.1177/1129729819851323. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
Radiologic justification for endovascular treatment of a dialysis arteriovenous fistula circuit stenosis is currently based on ⩾50% severity. However, the clinical significance of any given stenosis is not always clear. The minimum luminal diameter of any stenotic lesion in the arteriovenous fistula circuit might exert a more predictive effect on the arteriovenous fistula blood flow rate (Qa).
To investigate relationships between anatomic parameters of stenosis and Qa, this study was conducted in a cohort of patients with a variety of arteriovenous fistula stenotic lesions. The goals were to determine (1) the degree of correlation between arteriovenous fistula stenosis estimated during the procedure, and that which is measured, and (2) the correlations between two anatomic stenosis parameters (percent stenosis and stenosis minimum luminal diameter) and Qa.
The cohort comprised 113 patients. Only a moderate correlation between estimated and measured stenosis was seen. A correlation between measured stenosis and Qa for the whole cohort was not seen, but a weak correlation between estimated stenosis and Qa was seen. Correlations between stenosis minimum luminal diameter and Qa were superior. The superiority of stenosis minimum luminal diameter to percent stenosis in correlating with a Qa of <500 mL/h was also demonstrated by receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. Stenosis minimum luminal diameter cutoffs of ⩽2.5 mm or >4 mm seemed to have a good predictive value of Qa.
Percent stenosis determination is fraught with uncertainty and exhibits a weak correlation with Qa. Compared with percent stenosis, the minimum luminal diameter of the stenosis demonstrates a superior correlation with Qa.
目前,透析动静脉内瘘通路狭窄的血管内治疗的放射学依据是狭窄程度≥50%。然而,任何给定狭窄的临床意义并不总是明确的。动静脉内瘘通路中任何狭窄病变的最小管腔直径可能对动静脉内瘘血流量(Qa)具有更强的预测作用。
为了研究狭窄的解剖学参数与Qa之间的关系,本研究纳入了一组患有各种动静脉内瘘狭窄病变的患者。目标是确定:(1)术中估计的动静脉内瘘狭窄程度与测量的狭窄程度之间的相关程度;(2)两个解剖学狭窄参数(狭窄百分比和狭窄最小管腔直径)与Qa之间的相关性。
该队列包括113名患者。估计的狭窄程度与测量的狭窄程度之间仅呈现中度相关性。整个队列中测量的狭窄程度与Qa之间未发现相关性,但估计的狭窄程度与Qa之间存在弱相关性。狭窄最小管腔直径与Qa之间的相关性更强。受试者工作特征曲线分析也表明,在与<500 mL/h的Qa相关性方面,狭窄最小管腔直径优于狭窄百分比。狭窄最小管腔直径≤2.5 mm或>4 mm的截断值似乎对Qa具有良好的预测价值。
狭窄百分比的测定充满不确定性,且与Qa的相关性较弱。与狭窄百分比相比,狭窄的最小管腔直径与Qa的相关性更强。