Suppr超能文献

改良 Watson-Jones 入路全髋关节置换术中仰卧位与侧卧位对髋臼杯准确定位的比较:一项随机单盲对照试验。

Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Hospital, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8519 Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Hospital, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8519 Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):915-922. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The orientation of the acetabular cup is a critical factor for prevention of various postoperative complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although most patients are treated in either supine or lateral position during surgery, it is still unclear which position is superior to achieve more accurate cup positioning. Our study was conducted in order to answer the following questions: (1) does the supine position provide a higher accuracy of cup positioning than the lateral position in THA using modified Watson-Jones approach? (2) is there any difference in the distribution of cup position between the two positions? Hypothesis Our hypothesis was that the supine position would provide a higher accuracy of cup positioning than the lateral position in THA using modified Watson-Jones approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-center prospective randomized study (registration number: UMIN000021627) was conducted between May 2016 and December 2017. We recruited a total of 60 participants undergoing unilateral primary cementless THA using modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach based on the result of the sample size calculation. They were randomly assigned to either supine position (n=29) or lateral position (n=31). The cup alignment was targeted using a goniometer during surgery. The radiographic cup inclination was targeted to 40° and the radiographic cup anteversion was targeted considering the femoral stem anteversion during surgery. Postoperative cup alignment was measured by plain radiography and computed tomography. We defined the difference between postoperative and target cup angle as target error and our primary outcome was the absolute value of the target angle. As secondary outcome, the distribution of the target error was evaluated. The target errors of each inclination and anteversion were divided into 3 groups; neutral (-3°≤the target error≤3°), positive error (3°<the target error), and negative error (the target error<-3°).

RESULTS

The assessment of primary outcome for all recruited patients showed that supine group was significantly more accurate than lateral group in terms of radiographic inclination (2.4° vs. 4.5°, respectively, mean difference 2.1°; 95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 3.5; p<0.01). There was no significant difference in terms of radiographic cup anteversion (5.6° vs. 5.2°, mean difference 0.4°; 95% confidence interval, -1.8 to 2.6; p=0.69). The rate of positive error of anteversion in supine and lateral group was larger than that of negative value of anteversion (51.7% vs. 10.3% and 48.4% vs. 12.9%, respectively). Any acute complication (dislocation, fracture, and infection) was not found in both groups during postoperative 3 months.

DISCUSSION

In this randomized-controlled trial, higher accuracy of acetabular cup inclination was provided by supine position than by lateral position in THA. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between both groups in terms of cup anteversion. In both groups, most cups were placed with larger anteversion than we targeted. Modified Watson-Jones approach in both positions should be performed considering these results.

STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000021627. Level of evidence II, randomised controlled study (population-limited).

摘要

背景

髋臼杯的方向是全髋关节置换术(THA)预防各种术后并发症的关键因素。尽管大多数患者在手术中处于仰卧位或侧卧位,但仍不清楚哪种体位更有利于实现更准确的杯定位。我们的研究旨在回答以下问题:(1)在使用改良 Watson-Jones 入路的 THA 中,仰卧位是否比侧卧位提供更高的杯定位准确性?(2)两种体位之间杯位置的分布是否存在差异?假设我们的假设是,在使用改良 Watson-Jones 入路的 THA 中,仰卧位比侧卧位提供更高的杯定位准确性。

患者和方法

这是一项于 2016 年 5 月至 2017 年 12 月期间进行的单中心前瞻性随机研究(注册号:UMIN000021627)。我们共招募了 60 名接受改良 Watson-Jones 前外侧入路的单侧初次非骨水泥 THA 的患者,根据样本量计算的结果进行随机分组。他们被随机分配到仰卧位(n=29)或侧卧位(n=31)。在手术中使用量角器来对准杯的方向。术中目标设定髋臼杯倾斜度为 40°,考虑股骨柄前倾角来确定髋臼杯前倾角。术后杯的定位通过普通 X 线和 CT 进行测量。我们将术后和目标杯角度之间的差异定义为目标误差,我们的主要结果是目标角度的绝对值。作为次要结果,评估目标误差的分布。将每个倾斜角和前倾角的目标误差分为 3 组:中性(-3°≤目标误差≤3°)、正误差(3°<目标误差)和负误差(目标误差<-3°)。

结果

所有入组患者的主要结局评估结果显示,仰卧组在影像学倾斜方面明显比侧卧位更准确(分别为 2.4°和 4.5°,平均差异 2.1°;95%置信区间,0.7 至 3.5;p<0.01)。在影像学髋臼杯前倾角方面无显著差异(分别为 5.6°和 5.2°,平均差异 0.4°;95%置信区间,-1.8 至 2.6;p=0.69)。仰卧位和侧卧位组的前倾角正误差率均大于负误差率(分别为 51.7%和 10.3%,48.4%和 12.9%)。在术后 3 个月内,两组均未发现任何急性并发症(脱位、骨折和感染)。

讨论

在这项随机对照试验中,与侧卧位相比,仰卧位在 THA 中提供了更高的髋臼杯倾斜度准确性。另一方面,两组在杯前倾角方面无显著差异。在两组中,大多数杯的前倾角都大于我们的目标值。在考虑到这些结果的情况下,应在两种体位下进行改良 Watson-Jones 入路。

研究注册号

UMIN000021627。证据等级 II,随机对照研究(人群受限)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验