Suppr超能文献

术者利手对初次全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯定位的影响,与手术入路无关。系统评价和荟萃分析。

Surgeon handedness affects the acetabular cup positioning during primary total hip arthroplasty regardless of the surgical approach. a systematic review and metanalysis.

机构信息

Orthopedic Department, Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Assiut University School of Medicine, Assuit, 71515, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07868-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim was to investigate the effect of surgeon handedness on acetabular cup positioning, functional outcomes, and dislocation incidence during primary THA.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies published in English were searched in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus). A dominant side is a right-handed (RHD) or left-handed (LHD) surgeon who operates on the right or left hip, respectively. The opposite is considered to be the non-dominant side. We used odds ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals for quantitative data synthesis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² test, with outcomes graphically represented in a forest plot and a p-value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant; analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 (RevMan 5.4.1). >.

RESULT

Four observational studies were included out of 98 articles. Ten experienced surgeons participated (8 RHD and 2 LHD) and operated on 822 patients (1484 hips), divided equally between dominant and non-dominant sides, and the posterolateral approach was utilized in 80.9% of THAs. RHD surgeons operated on 1404 (94.6%) THAs. The pooled synthesis for inclination indicated no significant difference between either side [MD: 0.10 (95% CI -2.10 to 2.30, P = 0.93, I² = 91%)]. While the difference was significant for anteversion [MD: -2.37 (95% CI -3.82 to -0.93, P = 0.001, I² = 31%)]. The functional outcome was better on the dominant side [MD: 1.44 (95% CI 0.41 to 2.48, P = 0.006, I² = 0%)], and the dislocation incidence was significantly higher on the non-dominant side [OR: 0.45 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.81, P = 0.008, I² = 0%)].

CONCLUSION

Surgeon handedness and whether operating on the dominant or non-dominant side could affect the acetabular cup positioning and outcomes during primary THAs, even in the hands of high-volume surgeons.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨术者利手对初次全髋关节置换术(THA)中髋臼杯定位、功能结果和脱位发生率的影响。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南进行系统评价。在三个数据库(PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus)中检索发表的英文研究。优势手是指右利手(RHD)或左利手(LHD)医生分别在右侧或左侧髋关节手术,相对的是非优势手。我们使用二项数据的优势比值和连续数据的平均差异,定量数据综合采用 95%置信区间。使用 I²检验评估异质性,结果以森林图表示,p 值<0.05 认为具有统计学意义;使用 Review Manager 5.4(RevMan 5.4.1)进行分析。>.

结果

从 98 篇文章中纳入了 4 项观察性研究。10 名经验丰富的外科医生参与,分别为 8 名 RHD 和 2 名 LHD,对 822 名患者(1484 髋)进行了手术,优势侧和非优势侧各占一半,80.9%的 THA 采用后外侧入路。RHD 医生进行了 1404 例(94.6%)THA。髋臼杯倾斜度的综合分析结果表明,两侧之间无显著差异[MD:0.10(95% CI -2.10 至 2.30,P=0.93,I²=91%)]。然而,前倾角的差异有统计学意义[MD:-2.37(95% CI -3.82 至 -0.93,P=0.001,I²=31%)]。优势侧的功能结果更好[MD:1.44(95% CI 0.41 至 2.48,P=0.006,I²=0%)],而非优势侧的脱位发生率显著更高[OR:0.45(95% CI 0.25 至 0.81,P=0.008,I²=0%)]。

结论

即使在高容量外科医生手中,术者利手和手术优势侧或非优势侧可能会影响初次 THA 中的髋臼杯定位和结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce01/11460204/4d5ffd548be4/12891_2024_7868_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验