Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Voices of September 11th, New Canaan, Connecticut, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Aug;32(4):526-535. doi: 10.1002/jts.22407. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
Studies of terrorism-related deaths are few and mostly focus on short-term effects. To characterize long-term bereavement outcomes, including resilience/recovery and patterns of comorbidity, following the September 11, 2001 (9/11), terrorist attacks, we report mental health conditions and grief-related impairment in 454 9/11 bereaved family members. In addition, the contribution of non-9/11 lifetime traumas, pre-9/11 mental health conditions, post-9/11 interim life events, grief services, income adequacy, and social support were examined. Latent class analyses yielded three groups: healthy, comorbid without PTSD (comorbid/noPTSD), and comorbid with PTSD and impaired (comorbid/PTSD+I). Participants in the healthy group (66.1%) were least likely to meet thresholds for mental conditions, whereas those in the comorbid/noPTSD (21.3%) and comorbid/PTSD+I (12.6%) groups had higher probabilities of meeting depression, grief, and anxiety thresholds. These groups also endorsed more negatively valenced post-9/11 interim life events than the healthy group: comorbid/noPTSD vs. healthy, odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, 95% CI [0.76, 0.94]; comorbid/PTSD+I vs. healthy, OR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.76, 0.96]. Comorbid/PTSD+I was the only group with elevated probabilities of meeting clinical thresholds for PTSD (.64) and grief-related impairment (.94). This group was also more likely to include bereaved parents: comorbid/PTSD+I vs. healthy, OR = 12.96, 95% CI [1.97, 85.41]; comorbid/PTSD+I vs. comorbid/noPTSD, OR = 15.55, 95% CI [1.63, 148.41]); and to experience more non-9/11 lifetime traumas: comorbid/PTSD+I vs. healthy, OR = 4.34, 95% CI [1.28, 14.70]; comorbid/PTSD+I vs. comorbid/noPTSD, OR = 6.54, 95% CI [1.53, 27.95]. Clinical and community programs should target this high-risk group to identify individuals in need of services.
对恐怖主义相关死亡的研究很少,且大多集中在短期影响上。为了描述 9/11 恐怖袭击后的长期丧亲结局,包括韧性/恢复和共病模式,我们报告了 454 名 9/11 丧亲家庭成员的心理健康状况和与悲伤相关的障碍。此外,还研究了非 9/11 终身创伤、9/11 前心理健康状况、9/11 后临时生活事件、悲伤服务、收入充足性和社会支持的贡献。潜在类别分析产生了三个组:健康、无创伤后应激障碍的共病(共病/无 PTSD)和伴有创伤后应激障碍和受损的共病(共病/PTSD+I)。健康组(66.1%)的参与者最不可能达到精神疾病的阈值,而共病/无 PTSD 组(21.3%)和共病/PTSD+I 组(12.6%)的参与者更有可能达到抑郁、悲伤和焦虑的阈值。这些组也比健康组更认可有负面价值的 9/11 后临时生活事件:共病/无 PTSD 与健康组相比,优势比(OR)=0.84,95%可信区间[0.76,0.94];共病/PTSD+I 与健康组相比,OR=0.85,95%可信区间[0.76,0.96]。共病/PTSD+I 是唯一一组患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和悲伤相关障碍(.94)临床阈值的概率升高的组。该组也更有可能包括丧亲的父母:共病/PTSD+I 与健康组相比,OR=12.96,95%可信区间[1.97,85.41];共病/PTSD+I 与共病/无 PTSD 相比,OR=15.55,95%可信区间[1.63,148.41]);并且经历更多的非 9/11 终身创伤:共病/PTSD+I 与健康组相比,OR=4.34,95%可信区间[1.28,14.70];共病/PTSD+I 与共病/无 PTSD 相比,OR=6.54,95%可信区间[1.53,27.95]。临床和社区项目应针对这一高风险群体,以确定需要服务的个人。