Department of Clinical Psychology & Violence Research, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Institute for Emergency Psychology, Bielefeld, Germany.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2371762. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2371762. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
When traumatic events and losses intersect in the form of traumatic loss, these events can trigger both posttraumatic stress disorder and pathological grief. This systematic review investigates which characteristics differentiate between the development of the respective disorders or are associated with comorbidity. A systematic literature search using Medline, PubMed, APA PsycInfo and Web of Science yielded 46 studies which met the inclusion criteria. In these studies, PTSD was assessed using 17 and pathological grief using 16 different validated instruments. In the quality assessment, 12 studies were classified as average, 30 as above average, and 4 as excellent. The investigated risk factors were categorized into 19 superordinate clusters and processed using narrative synthesis. The relationship to the deceased, mental health issues, and religious beliefs seem to be associated specifically with pathological grief symptoms compared to PTSD symptoms. Social support and social emotions emerged as significant correlates and potential risk factors for both PTSD and pathological grief. Included studies had mainly cross-sectional designs. Differentiating factors between pathological grief and PTSD appear to exist. The results should be considered within the limitations of the heterogeneity of the included studies and the research field. There is a lack of studies (1) using a longitudinal study design, (2) starting data collection early following the traumatic loss, (3) using standardized, up-to-date measurement instruments and (4) including comorbidity in their analyses. Further research is urgently needed for more accurate (acute) screenings, prognoses, and interventions following traumatic loss.
当创伤性事件和丧失以创伤性丧失的形式交叉时,这些事件可能会引发创伤后应激障碍和病理性悲伤。本系统评价研究了区分各自疾病发展的特征或与共病相关的特征。使用 Medline、PubMed、APA PsycInfo 和 Web of Science 进行系统文献检索,共获得 46 项符合纳入标准的研究。在这些研究中,使用 17 种不同的验证工具评估 PTSD,使用 16 种不同的验证工具评估病理性悲伤。在质量评估中,12 项研究被归类为平均水平,30 项研究为高于平均水平,4 项研究为优秀水平。调查的风险因素分为 19 个超级集群,并使用叙述性综合进行处理。与死者的关系、心理健康问题和宗教信仰似乎与病理性悲伤症状相关,而与 PTSD 症状无关。社会支持和社会情绪似乎是 PTSD 和病理性悲伤的重要相关因素和潜在风险因素。纳入的研究主要是横断面设计。病理性悲伤和 PTSD 之间似乎存在区分因素。研究结果应在纳入研究的异质性和研究领域的局限性内考虑。目前缺乏以下研究:(1)采用纵向研究设计,(2)在创伤性丧失后尽早开始收集数据,(3)使用标准化、最新的测量工具,(4)在分析中纳入共病情况。创伤性丧失后,迫切需要进一步研究以进行更准确的(急性)筛查、预后和干预。